The four main thematic categories, with descriptions and examples, used as a guiding framework for categorizing survey responses
| Category | Description | Example | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Network organization | Formal or informal structure, degree of commitment and funding | Informal cooperation vs. formally funded projects such as I front-nettverket | (Bressers and Lulofs, 2010; Fünfgeld, 2015; Shyrokykh, 2022; Thomas, 2002) |
| Adaptation types | Type of adaptation activity: institutional, physical/structural or social | Zoning plans (institutional), sea walls (physical), awareness campaigns (social) | (Berrang-Ford et al., 2021; Noble et al., 2015; O’Brien, 2009; Tompkins et al., 2018) |
| Risk focus | Whether the network addresses direct or transboundary climate risks | Local flooding vs regional food supply impacts | (Berninger et al., 2022; Noble et al., 2015; O'Neill et al., 2022) |
| Level of focus | Whether CCA is the network’s primary or secondary focus | Dedicated CCA planning vs integration within spatial planning | (Beitnes et al., 2025; Dąbrowski, 2018; Hauge et al., 2019; Leiren and Jacobsen, 2018; Selseng et al., 2021) |
| Category | Description | Example | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Network organization | Formal or informal structure, degree of commitment and funding | Informal cooperation vs. formally funded projects such as | ( |
| Adaptation types | Type of adaptation activity: institutional, physical/structural or social | Zoning plans (institutional), sea walls (physical), awareness campaigns (social) | ( |
| Risk focus | Whether the network addresses direct or transboundary climate risks | Local flooding vs regional food supply impacts | ( |
| Level of focus | Whether | Dedicated | ( |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.