Table 3. Model fitness statistics... | Emerald Publishing

Table 3.

Model fitness statistics

Heterotrait–monotrait ratio (HTMT)
Variables	1	2	3	4	5	6
1. Ethical climate	0.749
2. Sustainability training effectiveness	0.406	0.749
3. Green shared vision	0.354	0.406	0.616
4. Skepticism toward green claims	0.390	0.354	0.490	0.833
5. Supplier monitoring rigor	0.685	0.390	0.437	0.791	0.756
6. Greenwashing risk	0.377	0.685	0.751	0.675	0.647	0.665
	F square				R square
		Green shared vision	Greenwashing risk	Skepticism toward green claims	Supplier monitoring rigor	R-square	R-square adjusted
Ethical climate	0.008	0.002	0.125	0.096		R-square	R-square adjusted
Green shared vision		0.074			0.036	0.034
Skepticism toward green claims		0.164			0.588	0.587
Supplier monitoring rigor		0.065			0.777	0.776
Sustainability training effectiveness	0.174	0.220	0.036	0.289
Greenwashing risk					0.799	0.798
Model fitness stats	SRMR		d_ULS	d_G	Chi-Square	NFI
Model fitness stats	Estimated = 0.057	Structural = 0.077	7.421	2.767	11357.749	0.616

Heterotrait–monotrait ratio (HTMT)
Variables	1	2	3	4	5	6
1. Ethical climate	0.749
2. Sustainability training effectiveness	0.406	0.749
3. Green shared vision	0.354	0.406	0.616
4. Skepticism toward green claims	0.390	0.354	0.490	0.833
5. Supplier monitoring rigor	0.685	0.390	0.437	0.791	0.756
6. Greenwashing risk	0.377	0.685	0.751	0.675	0.647	0.665
	F square				R square
		Green shared vision	Greenwashing risk	Skepticism toward green claims	Supplier monitoring rigor	R-square	R-square adjusted
Ethical climate	0.008	0.002	0.125	0.096		R-square	R-square adjusted
Green shared vision		0.074			0.036	0.034
Skepticism toward green claims		0.164			0.588	0.587
Supplier monitoring rigor		0.065			0.777	0.776
Sustainability training effectiveness	0.174	0.220	0.036	0.289
Greenwashing risk					0.799	0.798
Model fitness stats	SRMR		d_ULS	d_G	Chi-Square	NFI
Model fitness stats	Estimated = 0.057	Structural = 0.077	7.421	2.767	11357.749	0.616

Source(s): Authors’ own creation