Table 5

Campbell–thompson (C-T) test results for in-sample and out-of-sample forecasts: ADL-MIDAS without green innovation versus AR benchmark

ADL-MIDAS (PCR) vs ARADL-MIDAS (TCR) vs AR
In-sampleOut-of-sampleIn-sampleOut-of-sample
h = 4h = 8h = 12h = 4h = 8h = 12
Communication service0.10040.0516−0.00740.33720.00050.02360.02620.3594
Consumer discretionary0.24540.20230.19170.22350.36630.35660.34990.3754
Consumer staple−0.0514−0.04540.00380.15180.13270.13230.15140.2775
Energy0.00960.00870.09290.05590.07650.06770.13570.1004
Financial0.08480.07710.10910.12160.10170.10200.10260.1152
Health care0.07380.09060.08900.10850.17530.04280.03070.0514
Industrial0.13700.07790.15040.14420.17710.11470.16450.1584
Information technology0.33220.31860.28630.39980.18440.15110.20920.3350
Material0.12650.09820.09010.28300.25430.22620.22400.3885
Real estate0.97930.97970.98160.98260.97540.97610.97870.9799
Utility−4.8012−4.0907−3.8912−3.65220.11210.10130.22130.2220

Note(s): The C–T test results are based on the forecast performance comparison of the ADL-MIDAS-based predictive model as against the AR process. Hypothetically, a positive C-T statistic or value implies that the ADL-MIDAS based predictive model outperforms the AR process and the reverse holds if the statistic is negative

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal