GenAI impact on participants' teaching and research (N = 49)
| GenAI has… | M |
|---|---|
| made my teaching more efficient by saving time and resources | 3.65 |
| made my research more efficient by saving time and resources | 3.65 |
| allowed me to innovate in my teaching approaches | 3.49 |
| significantly impacted how I teach | 3.26 |
| allowed me to innovate in research approaches | 3.20 |
| significantly impacted how I conduct research | 3.20 |
| significantly improved the quality of my teaching | 3.12 |
| significantly improved the quality of my research | 3.06 |
| significantly improved student engagement in my courses | 2.91 |
| GenAI has… | |
|---|---|
| made my teaching more efficient by saving time and resources | 3.65 |
| made my research more efficient by saving time and resources | 3.65 |
| allowed me to innovate in my teaching approaches | 3.49 |
| significantly impacted how I teach | 3.26 |
| allowed me to innovate in research approaches | 3.20 |
| significantly impacted how I conduct research | 3.20 |
| significantly improved the quality of my teaching | 3.12 |
| significantly improved the quality of my research | 3.06 |
| significantly improved student engagement in my courses | 2.91 |
Note(s): M = Average, on a scale from 1(Strongly Disagree) to 5(Strongly Agree)
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.