Table 6

The threshold level of institutional quality dimensions that trigger a significant impact of environmental tax on trade development

Variables(11)
Political stability
(12)
Government effectiveness
(13)
Control of corruption
(14)
Rule of law
(15)
Regulatory quality
Lower regimeUpper regimeLower regimeUpper regimeLower regimeUpper regimeLower regimeUpper regimeLower regimeUpper regime
Trade development = Lag0.471***7.67***0.619***8.87***0.651***9.593**0.489***4.56***0.557***6.670***
(0.0430)(1.02)(0.0429)(1.071)(0.0585)(4.874)(0.0746)(0.508)(0.0890)(1.389)
Environmental tax−10.0120.34**−5.467**4.921***−1.991**2.580***−1.6725.971***−22.69**23.39**
(6.971)(10.27)(1.48)(1.50)(0.686)(0.046)(1.286)(2.710)9.60)(9.222)
Carbon emission (CO2)−5.401**−20.49**−66.97***67.81***63.85−63.69−3.6687.063***−2.749*12.39**
(1.50)(5.45)(17.01)(11.40)(85.26)(89.71)(8.44)(2.81)(1.84)(6.17)
Energy usage−101.8*43.51***−315.2***254.3***−106.6***−17.19−40.97*91.2***77.82***−70.2***
(45.95)(14.02)(59.9)(50.9)(32.6)(35.8)(18.6)(18.3)(13.3)(22.5)
Foreign direct investment−0.1460.561**−0.5710.644**−0.505***0.626***0.0265−0.211−0.1430.226
(0.235)(0.225)(0.552)(0.241)(0.136)(0.142)(0.166)(0.560)(0.153)(0.509)
Agricultural growth−0.5340.306−2.0071.729−0.1260.183−0.6110.119−0.4920.406
(0.462)(0.514)(1.476)(1.730)(2.402)(2.338)(0.545)(0.753)(0.918)(0.447)
GDP growth0.1290.388−1.281*2.103**−2.512*−2.349**−0.559*0.601***0.004910.464***
(0.243)(0.311)(0.773)(0.800)(1.372)(0.842)(0.261)(0.181)(0.136)(0.126)
cons_<−27.88−490.7284.71,278**683.0**
(183.0)(1,010)(1,098)(509.2)(344.7)
Threshold (r)3.296***−1.400***−1.375***−1.283***−1.066***
(0.463)(0.167)(0.137)(0.173)(0.179)
Kink slope16.9***−33.41***−10.61***−21.72***11.10***
(1.272)(5.22)(2.484)(5.057)(3.641)
Countries2525252525

Note(s): Standard errors in parentheses. ***p < 0.01, **p < 0.05, *p < 0.1

Threshold estimation based on grid_num (50), trim_rate (0.1), boost (100)

Dependent variable is trade development; threshold variables are dimensions of institutional quality [Political stability –(11); Government effectiveness –(12); Control of corruption – (13); Rule of law – (14); Regulatory quality – (15)

Source(s): Authors’ compilation, 2025

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options