Table 2. Negative binomial regression... | Emerald Publishing

Table 2.

Negative binomial regression results for the Green Transformation Index

Predictor	Coefficient	Incidence rate ratio (IRR)	Bootstrap p-value	Interpretation
KKK status	1.42	4.14	< 0.001	Strongest predictor
Green strategy	0.68	1.97	0.012	Strong positive effect
ESG strategy	0.71	2.03	0.008	Strong positive effect
Innovation index (z)	0.39	1.48	0.003	Significant positive
Cooperation index (z)	0.31	1.36	0.018	Moderate positive
Log(budget) (z)	0.22	1.25	0.045	Positive effect of resources
Cluster size (z)	−0.04	0.96	0.68	No independent effect
Cluster age (z)	0.18	1.20	0.09	Weak positive trend

Predictor	Coefficient	Incidence rate ratio (IRR)	Bootstrap p-value	Interpretation
KKK status	1.42	4.14	< 0.001	Strongest predictor
Green strategy	0.68	1.97	0.012	Strong positive effect
ESG strategy	0.71	2.03	0.008	Strong positive effect
Innovation index (z)	0.39	1.48	0.003	Significant positive
Cooperation index (z)	0.31	1.36	0.018	Moderate positive
Log(budget) (z)	0.22	1.25	0.045	Positive effect of resources
Cluster size (z)	−0.04	0.96	0.68	No independent effect
Cluster age (z)	0.18	1.20	0.09	Weak positive trend

Source(s): Authors’ own work