Table 2.

AHP Scale and instrument sample

Applied scale for pairwise comparison
ScaleIntensityDefinition
1Equal importanceTwo activities contribute equally to the objective
2Weak or slightExperience and judgment slightly favor One activity over another
3Moderate importanceExperience and judgment strongly favor One activity over another
4Moderate plusAn activity is favored very strongly over another; its dominance is demonstrated in practice
5Strong importanceThe evidence favoring One activity over another is of the highest possible order of affirmation
6Strong plusA reasonable assumption
7Very strong or demonstrated importanceMay be difficult to assign the best value but when compared with other contrasting activities the size of the small numbers would not be too noticeable, yet they can still indicate the relative importance of the activities
8Very, very strong
9Extreme importance
Reciprocals:
If activity i has One of the above non-zero numbers assigned to it when compared with
Activity j, then j has the reciprocal value when compared with i
If the activities are very close, a reasonable assumption may be made
Factors comparison example
Factor A98765432123456789Factor B
CommitmentCommunication
CommitmentManagerial skills
CommitmentOrganizational culture
CommitmentPlans development
CommunicationManagerial skills
CommunicationOrganizational culture
CommunicationPlans development
Subfactors comparison example
Subfactor A98765432123456789Subfactor B
ResponsabilityLoyalty
ResponsabilitySense of need

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal