AHP Scale and instrument sample
| Applied scale for pairwise comparison | ||
|---|---|---|
| Scale | Intensity | Definition |
| 1 | Equal importance | Two activities contribute equally to the objective |
| 2 | Weak or slight | Experience and judgment slightly favor One activity over another |
| 3 | Moderate importance | Experience and judgment strongly favor One activity over another |
| 4 | Moderate plus | An activity is favored very strongly over another; its dominance is demonstrated in practice |
| 5 | Strong importance | The evidence favoring One activity over another is of the highest possible order of affirmation |
| 6 | Strong plus | A reasonable assumption |
| 7 | Very strong or demonstrated importance | May be difficult to assign the best value but when compared with other contrasting activities the size of the small numbers would not be too noticeable, yet they can still indicate the relative importance of the activities |
| 8 | Very, very strong | – |
| 9 | Extreme importance | – |
| Reciprocals: | ||
| If activity i has One of the above non-zero numbers assigned to it when compared with | ||
| Activity j, then j has the reciprocal value when compared with i | ||
| If the activities are very close, a reasonable assumption may be made | ||
| Applied scale for pairwise comparison | ||
|---|---|---|
| Scale | Intensity | Definition |
| 1 | Equal importance | Two activities contribute equally to the objective |
| 2 | Weak or slight | Experience and judgment slightly favor One activity over another |
| 3 | Moderate importance | Experience and judgment strongly favor One activity over another |
| 4 | Moderate plus | An activity is favored very strongly over another; its dominance is demonstrated in practice |
| 5 | Strong importance | The evidence favoring One activity over another is of the highest possible order of affirmation |
| 6 | Strong plus | A reasonable assumption |
| 7 | Very strong or demonstrated importance | May be difficult to assign the best value but when compared with other contrasting activities the size of the small numbers would not be too noticeable, yet they can still indicate the relative importance of the activities |
| 8 | Very, very strong | – |
| 9 | Extreme importance | – |
| Reciprocals: | ||
| If activity | ||
| Activity | ||
| If the activities are very close, a reasonable assumption may be made | ||
| Factors comparison example | ||||||||||||||||||
| Factor A | 9 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | Factor B |
| Commitment | Communication | |||||||||||||||||
| Commitment | Managerial skills | |||||||||||||||||
| Commitment | Organizational culture | |||||||||||||||||
| Commitment | Plans development | |||||||||||||||||
| Communication | Managerial skills | |||||||||||||||||
| Communication | Organizational culture | |||||||||||||||||
| Communication | Plans development | |||||||||||||||||
| Subfactors comparison example | ||||||||||||||||||
| Subfactor A | 9 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | Subfactor B |
| Responsability | Loyalty | |||||||||||||||||
| Responsability | Sense of need | |||||||||||||||||
| Factors comparison example | ||||||||||||||||||
| Factor A | 9 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | Factor B |
| Commitment | Communication | |||||||||||||||||
| Commitment | Managerial skills | |||||||||||||||||
| Commitment | Organizational culture | |||||||||||||||||
| Commitment | Plans development | |||||||||||||||||
| Communication | Managerial skills | |||||||||||||||||
| Communication | Organizational culture | |||||||||||||||||
| Communication | Plans development | |||||||||||||||||
| Subfactors comparison example | ||||||||||||||||||
| Subfactor A | 9 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | Subfactor B |
| Responsability | Loyalty | |||||||||||||||||
| Responsability | Sense of need | |||||||||||||||||
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.