Table 2

Perspectives of interpreter-mediated verbal communication

Total n (%)a
Language spoken by interpreter at most recent visit (N = 64)
Mandarin22 (34.4)
Arabic13 (20.3)
Vietnamese10 (15.6)
Farsi8 (12.5)
Burmese5 (7.8)
Chinese5 (7.8)
Dari1 (1.6)
Alignment with language preference (N = 68)
Interpretation provided in their preferred language67 (98.5)
Interpretation not provided in their preferred language1 (1.5)
Prompt for interpreter services (N = 68)
Participant requested33 (48.5)
Staff initiated33 (48.5)
Both participant requested and staff initiated1 (1.5)
Unsure1 (1.5)
Confidence to ask for an interpreter (N = 66)
Confident62 (93.9)
Not confident4 (6.1)
Interpretation modality experienced (N = 68)*
In-person62 (91.2)
Telephone22 (32.4)
Telehealth or video conference4 (5.9)
iPad application0 (0.0)
First preference for interpretation modality (N = 61)*
In-person57 (93.4)
Telephone2 (3.3)
Telehealth or video conference0 (0.0)
iPad application1 (1.6)
Telephone and iPad application1 (1.6)
Second preference for interpretation modality (N = 46)*
In-person0 (0.0)
Telephone28 (60.9)
Telehealth of video conference12 (26.1)
iPad application5 (10.9)
Comfortable to communicate with the assistance of an interpreter (N = 68)
Comfortable66 (97.1)
Not comfortable2 (2.9)
Factors promoting comfort (N = 67)*
Friendly HCP44 (65.7)
Friendly interpreter44 (65.7)
Female HCP34 (50.7)
Female interpreter31 (46.3)
Family member, friend or support worker present24 (35.8)
Same HCP as before18 (26.9)
Same interpreter as before15 (22.4)
Other4 (6.0)

Note(s): *Multiple response item. Percentages reflect the proportion of participants who selected each response option

a

Valid percentage. Missing data removed

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal