Table 2

Summary of hypothesis testing results for perceptions of GenAI tools

HypothesisOutcome variableGenAI typeDirection hypothesizedANCOVA result (p)Supported
H1aCareer ReadinessText-basedTeam > Individual<0.001Yes
H1bCareer ReadinessImage-basedTeam > Individual0.304No
H2aSaves Time (Ease of Use for Creative Development)Text-basedTeam > Individual0.310No
H2bSaves Time (Ease of Use for Creative Development)Image-basedTeam > Individual0.896No
H3aExpand Insights and PerspectivesText-basedTeam > Individual0.143No
H3bExpand Insights and PerspectivesImage-basedTeam > Individual0.506No
H4aLearning SupportText-basedTeam > Individual0.042Yes
H4bLearning SupportImage-basedTeam > Individual0.689No
H5aAvailability of ToolText-basedTeam > Individual0.004Yes
H5bAvailability of ToolImage-basedTeam > Individual0.620No
H6aConcerns Regarding Responsible UseText-basedTeam < Individual0.127No
H6bConcerns Regarding Responsible UseImage-basedTeam < Individual0.057No
H7aPerception for Future/CareerText-basedTeam > Individual0.349No
H7bPerception for Future/CareerImage-basedTeam > Individual0.968No

Note(s): Hypotheses were evaluated at α = 0.05. Supported hypotheses indicate statistically significant differences between team- and individual-based GenAI use after controlling for pre-test scores

Source(s): Authors’ own work

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal