Table 6.

Regression results for the effect of different joint audit pairs on audit quality in French, Moroccan, and Tunisian companies across company sizes

DataFrench companiesMoroccan companiesTunisian companies
SmallMediumLargeSmallMediumLargeSmallMediumLarge
Panel A: Comparison of audit quality between pairs that include at least one of the Big Four audit firms
B4B4 VS B4S1−0.0289** (0.0125)−0.00798** (0.00400)0.00328* (0.00190)0.0809 (0.0642)0.0279* (0.0162)−0.00779 (0.0159)0.0762 (0.0937)−0.0742 (0.154)0.203 (0.130)
B4B4 VS B4S2−0.0279** (0.0119)−0.00743* (0.00407)0.00154 (0.00362)0.111* (0.0585)−0.0183 (0.0301)−0.0495 (0.0335)0.0652 (0.0643)−0.0939 (0.121)−0.0685 (0.164)
B4S1 VS B4S20.000989 (0.00490)0.000555 (0.00340)−0.00174 (0.00385)0.0306 (0.0283)−0.0461* (0.0250)−0.0417 (0.0301)−0.0111 (0.0466)−0.0196 (0.0508)−0.271* (0.137)
Panel B: Comparison of audit quality between pairs that include at least one of the Big Four audit firms and pairs without any Big Four audit firms
B4B4 VS S1S1−0.0250* (0.0131)−0.00245 (0.00536)0.0143* (0.00776)0.106* (0.0584)0.0242 (0.0284)−0.0391 (0.0249)−0.442** (0.198)
B4B4 VS S1S2−0.0354*** (0.0122)−0.00457 (0.00534)−0.000814 (0.00440)0.122** (0.0599)−0.00140 (0.0353)−0.0328 (0.0253)0.00509 (0.0803)−0.157 (0.109)0.238** (0.108)
B4B4 VS S2S2−0.0223* (0.0126)−0.00741 (0.00511)−0.0105 (0.00754)0.123** (0.0605)0.0122 (0.0375)−0.0372 (0.0298)0.0787 (0.0801)−0.107 (0.124)0.0713 (0.0874)
B4S1 VS S1S10.00391 (0.00800)0.00553 (0.00500)0.0110 (0.00791)0.0250 (0.0263)−0.00367 (0.0234)−0.0313 (0.0245)−0.645** (0.269)
B4S1 VS S1S2−0.00654 (0.00611)0.00341 (0.00482)−0.00409 (0.00435)0.0407 (0.0284)−0.0293 (0.0274)−0.0250 (0.0227)−0.0712 (0.0553)−0.0831 (0.0707)0.0358 (0.0734)
B4S1 VS S2S20.00665 (0.00696)0.000570 (0.00457)−0.0138* (0.00756)0.0425 (0.0359)−0.0156 (0.0313)−0.0294 (0.0281)0.00247 (0.0339)−0.0325 (0.0562)−0.131 (0.0866)
B4S2 VS S1S10.00292 (0.00706)0.00498 (0.00523)0.0128 (0.00830)−0.00561 (0.0267)0.0424* (0.0252)0.0104 (0.0365)−0.374 (0.264)
B4S2 VS S1S2−0.00753 (0.00489)0.00286 (0.00476)−0.00236 (0.00525)0.0101 (0.0277)0.0169 (0.0252)0.0167 (0.0323)−0.0601 (0.0421)−0.0634 (0.0423)0.307*** (0.115)
B4S2 VS S2S20.00566 (0.00586)1.55e-05 (0.00434)−0.0120 (0.00792)0.0119 (0.0247)0.0305 (0.0287)0.0124 (0.0333)0.0136 (0.0373)−0.0129 (0.0286)0.140 (0.113)
Panel C: Comparison of audit quality between pairs without any of the Big Four audit firms
S1S1 VS S1S2−0.0105 (0.00742)−0.00212 (0.00625)−0.0151* (0.00903)0.0157 (0.0277)−0.0256 (0.0241)0.00630 (0.0232)−0.0736 (0.0455)−0.0506 (0.0491)0.681*** (0.244)
S1S1 VS S2S20.00274 (0.00793)−0.00496 (0.00585)−0.0248** (0.0107)0.0175 (0.0324)−0.0119 (0.0278)0.00198 (0.0294)0.514** (0.227)
S1S2 VS S2S20.0132** (0.00627)−0.00284 (0.00562)−0.00969 (0.00821)0.00177 (0.0237)0.0136−0.00432 (0.0229)0.0736 (0.0455)0.0506 (0.0491)−0.167*** (0.0540)
Note(s):

***, **, * indicates significant at 1, 5, and 10% significance levels, respectively

Source(s): Authors’ own creation

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal