Table 1.

Summary of framework for e-government value positions (Distel and Lindgren, 2023)

DimensionsEfficiency idealProfessionalism idealService idealEngagement ideal
Public administration traditionLean, efficient administration minimizing waste gathered from taxpayersRobust, rule-based administration ensuring legality and accountabilityService-oriented administration maximizing public valueCollaborative administration oriented toward public participation
Representative valuesValue for money, cost reduction, productivityDurability, equity, legality and accountabilityCitizen centricity, service quality, responsivenessDemocracy, deliberation and participation
E-government purposeStreamline and rationalize administration with digital techProvide secure digital records and support standardized proceduresImprove availability, accessibility and usability of servicesEnable deliberation and co-production with citizens
Technological frame for ITAutomation to increase performance and reduce costsInfrastructure ensuring secure and compliant record-keepingService-enabling technology improving quality and reachNetwork facilitation supporting communication between government and citizens
Ideal view on citizensSelf-server: autonomous user of automated servicesCitizen: rights-bearing actor contributing to the legal recordService co-producer: partner shaping services and public valueEngaged agent: active participant in policy, service design and delivery

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal