Vision alignment with strategic documents
| Action field | Political guidelines | Unified strategic documents | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Settlement development | Emphasis on organic growth, reuse of existing buildings, innovative housing models | References to urban densification, architectural coherence, preservation of village character | Strong alignment between guidelines and strategic documents; implementation reflects a coherent long-term direction |
| Tourism development | Promotes inclusive tourism and regulation of large-scale projects | More growth-oriented, focus on infrastructure and marketing, less explicit balancing between tourism and community impact | Partial alignment: strategic plans show progress, but the balance between tourism intensity and local quality of life remains cautious |
| Traffic and mobility | Prioritize pedestrian and cycling infrastructure, e-mobility, traffic calming | Shows increasing investment in soft mobility, with projects promoting cycling, pedestrian-friendly urban design | Clear alignment: implementation is progressing steadily, though some measures remain in early stages |
| Environmental foresight | Sets ambitious goals for plastic reduction, biodiversity and renewable energy | Over time, it includes concrete measures on energy efficiency, waste reduction and climate adaptation | Good alignment: environmental measures are among the most visible areas of progress |
| Transparent politics and administration | Encourages digital services and participatory governance (e.g. GEM2GO app, Digital Village Square, citizen councils) | Reflected in planning documents, though with less operational detail on participatory processes | Alignment is present but partial; digitalization is advancing, while participation processes could be more consistently embedded |
| Living together | Supports childcare, elderly care, social integration and intergenerational interaction | Provides stable resources for education, youth services and social inclusion initiatives | Strong alignment: social cohesion is a clear municipal priority with sustained investment |
| Associations and events | Aims to strengthen community life through support for associations and cultural events | Long-standing support for youth, sports and cultural infrastructure and community-based initiatives | Good alignment: activities in this field are widely perceived as positive and well-established |
| Action field | Political guidelines | Unified strategic documents | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Settlement development | Emphasis on organic growth, reuse of existing buildings, innovative housing models | References to urban densification, architectural coherence, preservation of village character | Strong alignment between guidelines and strategic documents; implementation reflects a coherent long-term direction |
| Tourism development | Promotes inclusive tourism and regulation of large-scale projects | More growth-oriented, focus on infrastructure and marketing, less explicit balancing between tourism and community impact | Partial alignment: strategic plans show progress, but the balance between tourism intensity and local quality of life remains cautious |
| Traffic and mobility | Prioritize pedestrian and cycling infrastructure, e-mobility, traffic calming | Shows increasing investment in soft mobility, with projects promoting cycling, pedestrian-friendly urban design | Clear alignment: implementation is progressing steadily, though some measures remain in early stages |
| Environmental foresight | Sets ambitious goals for plastic reduction, biodiversity and renewable energy | Over time, it includes concrete measures on energy efficiency, waste reduction and climate adaptation | Good alignment: environmental measures are among the most visible areas of progress |
| Transparent politics and administration | Encourages digital services and participatory governance (e.g. GEM2GO app, Digital Village Square, citizen councils) | Reflected in planning documents, though with less operational detail on participatory processes | Alignment is present but partial; digitalization is advancing, while participation processes could be more consistently embedded |
| Living together | Supports childcare, elderly care, social integration and intergenerational interaction | Provides stable resources for education, youth services and social inclusion initiatives | Strong alignment: social cohesion is a clear municipal priority with sustained investment |
| Associations and events | Aims to strengthen community life through support for associations and cultural events | Long-standing support for youth, sports and cultural infrastructure and community-based initiatives | Good alignment: activities in this field are widely perceived as positive and well-established |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.