Spearman correlations for the theory-driven pairs
| Family | Pair | n | ρ | p | Holm p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current physiology to current international marketing | TS present vs MKT international present | 23 | 0.642 | 0.0010 | 0.0164 |
| Current physiology to current international marketing | TT present vs MKT international present | 23 | 0.635 | 0.0011 | 0.0182 |
| Current physiology to current international marketing | TM present vs MKT international present | 23 | 0.584 | 0.0034 | 0.0390 |
| Current physiology to current international marketing | TSI present vs MKT international present | 23 | 0.594 | 0.0028 | 0.0367 |
| Current physiology to current international marketing | FIN present vs MKT international present | 20 | 0.419 | 0.0661 | 0.3969 |
| Domestic to international carryover | MKT domestic present vs MKT international present | 23 | 0.623 | 0.0015 | 0.0227 |
| Domestic to international carryover | Domestic sensing vs international sensing | 23 | 0.567 | 0.0048 | 0.0477 |
| Domestic to international carryover | Domestic control vs international control | 23 | 0.587 | 0.0033 | 0.0390 |
| Capability change to international marketing change | ΔTSI vs ΔMKT international | 23 | 0.705 | 0.0002 | 0.0031 |
| Capability change to international marketing change | ΔTM vs ΔMKT international | 23 | 0.619 | 0.0016 | 0.0229 |
| Capability change to international marketing change | ΔTS vs ΔMKT international | 23 | 0.450 | 0.0312 | 0.2496 |
| Capability change to international marketing change | ΔFIN vs ΔMKT international | 20 | 0.440 | 0.0520 | 0.3641 |
| Family | Pair | ρ | Holm p | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current physiology to current international marketing | TS present vs MKT international present | 23 | 0.642 | 0.0010 | 0.0164 |
| Current physiology to current international marketing | TT present vs MKT international present | 23 | 0.635 | 0.0011 | 0.0182 |
| Current physiology to current international marketing | TM present vs MKT international present | 23 | 0.584 | 0.0034 | 0.0390 |
| Current physiology to current international marketing | TSI present vs MKT international present | 23 | 0.594 | 0.0028 | 0.0367 |
| Current physiology to current international marketing | FIN present vs MKT international present | 20 | 0.419 | 0.0661 | 0.3969 |
| Domestic to international carryover | MKT domestic present vs MKT international present | 23 | 0.623 | 0.0015 | 0.0227 |
| Domestic to international carryover | Domestic sensing vs international sensing | 23 | 0.567 | 0.0048 | 0.0477 |
| Domestic to international carryover | Domestic control vs international control | 23 | 0.587 | 0.0033 | 0.0390 |
| Capability change to international marketing change | ΔTSI vs ΔMKT international | 23 | 0.705 | 0.0002 | 0.0031 |
| Capability change to international marketing change | ΔTM vs ΔMKT international | 23 | 0.619 | 0.0016 | 0.0229 |
| Capability change to international marketing change | ΔTS vs ΔMKT international | 23 | 0.450 | 0.0312 | 0.2496 |
| Capability change to international marketing change | ΔFIN vs ΔMKT international | 20 | 0.440 | 0.0520 | 0.3641 |
Note(s): Table 8 reports the theory-driven correlation families discussed in the text. The Supplementary Workbook contains the full Spearman output. For finance-change correlations, missing finance observations remain missing in the inferential analysis (n = 20), so ΔFIN should be calculated as FIN_AVG_Present minus FIN_AVG_Past rather than from placeholder zeros in the firm-level sheet. Some executives were unwilling to disclose financial information
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.