Table 4 Structural model results...

Table 4

Structural model results (bootstrapping with 5,000 resamples)

Hypothesized path/Effect	β	Std. Error	t-value	p-value	95% BCa CI [lower, upper]	f²
Direct effects
H1: Conscious leadership → Conscious culture	0.512	0.087	5.863	< 0.001	[0.342, 0.688]	0.32
Conscious leadership → Higher purpose	0.672	0.067	10.099	< 0.001	[0.511, 0.774]	0.822
Higher purpose → Conscious culture	0.294	0.107	2.754	0.006	[0.070, 0.494]	0.106
Indirect (Mediation) Effect
H2: Conscious leadership → Higher purpose → Conscious culture	0.198	0.073	2.701	0.007	[0.056, 0.342]	–
Total Effects
Conscious leadership → Conscious culture (Total)	0.709	0.069	10.335	< 0.001	[0.537, 0.816]
R² of Endogenous Constructs
Higher purpose	0.451
Conscious culture	0.551

Hypothesized path/Effect	β	Std. Error	t-value	p-value	95% BCa CI [lower, upper]	f²
Direct effects
H1: Conscious leadership → Conscious culture	0.512	0.087	5.863	< 0.001	[0.342, 0.688]	0.32
Conscious leadership → Higher purpose	0.672	0.067	10.099	< 0.001	[0.511, 0.774]	0.822
Higher purpose → Conscious culture	0.294	0.107	2.754	0.006	[0.070, 0.494]	0.106
Indirect (Mediation) Effect
H2: Conscious leadership → Higher purpose → Conscious culture	0.198	0.073	2.701	0.007	[0.056, 0.342]	–
Total Effects
Conscious leadership → Conscious culture (Total)	0.709	0.069	10.335	< 0.001	[0.537, 0.816]
R² of Endogenous Constructs
Higher purpose	0.451
Conscious culture	0.551

Note(s): β = Path coefficient; Std. Error = Standard Error; BCa CI = Bias-Corrected and Accelerated Confidence Interval; ² = Effect size (f² ≥ 0.02 small, ≥0.15 medium, ≥0.35 large)

Significant paths (p < 0.05) are in italic.*

Source(s): Authors’ own work

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable