Table 1

Notable review articles involving B2B disruptions

CitationType of reviewArea of reviewKey findings
Alghababsheh et al. (2023) Systematic/qualitative(In)JusticeTaxonomy of B2B justice developed comprising dimensions of relationships and events involved
Baliga et al. (2021) Morphological analysisService failureIdentified 418 research gaps in B2B service failure and recovery
Bouazzaoui et al. (2020) Systematic/qualitative(In)JusticeThree main themes identified for the B2B justice literature
Bugert and Lasch (2018) Systematic/qualitativeDisruption in supply chainExplores modeling techniques to better mitigate disruptions
Crosno and Dahlstrom (2008) Meta-analysisOpportunismOpportunism negatively affects performance, norms, communication, coordination and satisfaction
Crosno and Dahlstrom (2010) Meta-analysisOpportunismCollaboration and commitment outweigh opportunism’s impact on performance
Crosno et al. (2021) Meta-analysisContract violations, opportunismContract specificity discourages opportunism, but utilization of contracts can backfire
Hawkins et al. (2009) Meta-analysisOpportunismRelational norms have a strong, negative correlation with opportunism
Hawkins et al. (2008) Systematic/qualitativeOpportunismReviews the theory, causes and effects of opportunism. Provides propositions
Dolgui et al. (2018) Systematic/qualitativeDisruption and recovery in supply chainIdentifies forms of supply chain disruption; prevention includes inventory planning and backup suppliers
Oliveira and Lumineau (2019) Systematic/qualitative“Dark side” of B2B relationshipsConflict, opportunism and unethical practices are the most prevalent forms of B2B disruption
Sharma and Parida (2018) Meta-analysisConflictOrganizational, interpersonal and environmental factors cause conflict
Tangpong et al. (2015) Systematic/qualitativeCompetition/win-lose partnershipsProposes Four new B2B relationship types: supplier-led, buyer-led, competitive and free will
Tong and Crosno (2016) Meta-analysisInformation asymmetryInformation sharing builds trust and commitment; information asymmetry reduces both
Wang and Yang (2013) Meta-analysisOpportunismGoal congruence most strongly reduces opportunism
Present researchBibliometric analysisAll forms of disruptionPerspectives on governance and disruption are interconnected. Emerging research addresses evolving technologies and globalization within exchanges
Source(s): Authors’ own work
[ViewLarge]
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal