Table 1 The review studies of...

Table 1

The review studies of biodiversity literature

Studies	Singh and Bharti (2023)	Hinkes and Peter (2020)	Russell et al. (2017)	Jones and Solomon (2013)	Blanco-Zaitegi et al. (2022)	Roberts et al. (2021)	Bebbington et al. (2023)	Adebayo et al. (2026)
Review Sample	194	16	N/A	N/A	63	40	40	122
Publication Journal Rank (ABS)	1	2	3	3	2	3	3	3
Review Period	2001–2021	All year	40 years	All year	All year	2013–2020	1992–2021	1984–2025
Sectors Examined	Hybrid	Private	Hybrid	Hybrid	Hybrid	Hybrid	Hybrid	Hybrid
Review Pattern	Themes	Topics and Subthemes	General^a	General	General^a	General	General^a	Themes

Studies	Singh and Bharti (2023)	Hinkes and Peter (2020)	Russell et al. (2017)	Jones and Solomon (2013)	Blanco-Zaitegi et al. (2022)	Roberts et al. (2021)	Bebbington et al. (2023)	Adebayo et al. (2026)
Review Sample	194	16	N/A	N/A	63	40	40	122
Publication Journal Rank (ABS)	1	2	3	3	2	3	3	3
Review Period	2001–2021	All year	40 years	All year	All year	2013–2020	1992–2021	1984–2025
Sectors Examined	Hybrid	Private	Hybrid	Hybrid	Hybrid	Hybrid	Hybrid	Hybrid
Review Pattern	Themes	Topics and Subthemes	General^a	General	General^a	General	General^a	Themes

Note(s):

Although Russell et al. (2017) and Bebbington et al. (2023) mentioned themes, we have classified their review pattern as general as they did not work with a predetermined theme but rather developed themes. Also, Blanco-Zaitegi et al.’s (2022) analyses extend beyond theme identification, which is one of their research questions, to answer some other research questions

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable