Table 3 Hypotheses verification a) AMe... | Emerald Publishing

Table 3

Hypotheses verification

a) AMe impact on CHM (Figure 1a)
Hypothesis	TOTAL professionals view Cmin/df = 3.26 CFI = 0.982 TLI = 0.979 RMSEA = 0.035 N = 1871 R² = 25%	AMe professionals view Cmin/df = 2.23 CFI = 0.978 TLI = 0.974 RMSEA = 0.035 N = 932 R² = 32%	nAMe Professionals view Cmin/df = 2.66 CFI = 0.975 TLI = 0.970 RMSEA = 0.042 N = 939 R² = 17%
H1a	0.50*** (sustained)	0.56*** (sustained)	0.41*** (sustained)

a) AMe impact on CHM (Figure 1a)
Hypothesis	TOTAL professionals viewCmin/df = 3.26 CFI = 0.982 TLI = 0.979 RMSEA = 0.035N = 1871 R² = 25%	AMe professionals viewCmin/df = 2.23 CFI = 0.978 TLI = 0.974 RMSEA = 0.035N = 932 R² = 32%	nAMeProfessionals viewCmin/df = 2.66 CFI = 0.975 TLI = 0.970 RMSEA = 0.042N = 939 R² = 17%
H1a	0.50*** (sustained)	0.56*** (sustained)	0.41*** (sustained)

b) nAMe impact on CHM (Figure 1b)
Hypothesis	TOTAL professionals view Cmin/df = 7.5 CFI = 0.976 TLI = 0.972 RMSEA = 0.057 N = 1871 R² = 7%	AMe professionals view Cmin/df = 4.2 CFI = 0.977 TLI = 0.974 RMSEA = 0.059 N = 932 R² = 00%	nAMe Professionals view Cmin/df = 4.5 CFI = 0.972 TLI = 0.968 RMSEA = 0.061 N = 939 R² = 2%
H1b	−0.27*** (sustained)	−0.07(.**) (sustained)	0.13*** (rejected)

b) nAMe impact on CHM (Figure 1b)
Hypothesis	TOTAL professionals viewCmin/df = 7.5 CFI = 0.976 TLI = 0.972 RMSEA = 0.057N = 1871 R² = 7%	AMe professionals viewCmin/df = 4.2 CFI = 0.977 TLI = 0.974 RMSEA = 0.059N = 932 R² = 00%	nAMeProfessionals viewCmin/df = 4.5 CFI = 0.972 TLI = 0.968 RMSEA = 0.061N = 939 R² = 2%
H1b	−0.27*** (sustained)	−0.07(.**)(sustained)	0.13*** (rejected)

c) AMe and nAMe employee relations model (Figure 1c)
Hypothesis	TOTAL professionals view Cmin/df = 4.55 CFI = 0.972 TLI = 0.969 RMSEA = 0.044 N = 1871 R² = 27%	AMe professionals view Cmin/df = 2.88 CFI = 0.972 TLI = 0.969 RMSEA = 0.045 N = 932 R² = 31%	nAMe Professionals view Cmin/df = 2.3 CFI = 0.943 TLI = 0.932 RMSEA = 0.073 N = 939 R² = 64%
H1a	0.46*** (sustained)	0.56*** (sustained)	0.40*** (sustained)
H1b	−0.14*** (sustained)	−0.07(.**)(sustained)	0.15*** (rejected)
H1c	−0.30*** (sustained)	−0.10(.***)(sustained)	−0.02(0.547)(rejected)

c) AMe and nAMe employee relations model (Figure 1c)
Hypothesis	TOTAL professionals viewCmin/df = 4.55 CFI = 0.972 TLI = 0.969 RMSEA = 0.044N = 1871 R² = 27%	AMe professionals viewCmin/df = 2.88 CFI = 0.972 TLI = 0.969 RMSEA = 0.045N = 932 R² = 31%	nAMeProfessionals viewCmin/df = 2.3 CFI = 0.943 TLI = 0.932 RMSEA = 0.073N = 939 R² = 64%
H1a	0.46*** (sustained)	0.56*** (sustained)	0.40*** (sustained)
H1b	−0.14*** (sustained)	−0.07(.**)(sustained)	0.15*** (rejected)
H1c	−0.30*** (sustained)	−0.10(.***)(sustained)	−0.02(0.547)(rejected)

d) AC impact on AMe and nAMe employees (Figure 1d)
Hypothesis	TOTAL professionals view Cmin/df = 5.77 CFI = 0.946 TLI = 0.942 RMSEA = 0.051 N = 1871 R² = 31%	AMe professionals view Cmin/df = 3.21 CFI = 0.950 TLI = 0.947 RMSEA = 0.049 N = 932 R² = 39%	nAMe Professionals view Cmin/df = 3.58 CFI = 0.944 TLI = 0.939 RMSEA = 0.052 N = 939 R² = 23%
H1a	0.64*** (sustained)	0.70*** (sustained)	0.45*** (sustained)
H1b	0.06* (sustained)	0.04(0.249)(rejected)	0.15*** (rejected)
H2a	0.52*** (sustained)	0.63*** (sustained)	0.56*** (sustained)
H2b	0.09*** (sustained)	0.04(0.315)(rejected)	0.11** (rejected)

d) AC impact on AMe and nAMe employees (Figure 1d)
Hypothesis	TOTAL professionals viewCmin/df = 5.77 CFI = 0.946 TLI = 0.942 RMSEA = 0.051N = 1871 R² = 31%	AMe professionals viewCmin/df = 3.21 CFI = 0.950 TLI = 0.947 RMSEA = 0.049N = 932 R² = 39%	nAMeProfessionals viewCmin/df = 3.58 CFI = 0.944 TLI = 0.939 RMSEA = 0.052N = 939 R² = 23%
H1a	0.64*** (sustained)	0.70*** (sustained)	0.45*** (sustained)
H1b	0.06* (sustained)	0.04(0.249)(rejected)	0.15*** (rejected)
H2a	0.52*** (sustained)	0.63*** (sustained)	0.56*** (sustained)
H2b	0.09*** (sustained)	0.04(0.315)(rejected)	0.11** (rejected)

Note(s): N = 1871, ML, standardized results *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ns—not significant result