Table 2.

The co-design process and outputs

Co-design researchSample sizeKey findingsOutputs
Stage 1 – Explore and Quantify Exploratory remote interviewsn = 22 interviews with older adults from urban and rural areas focused on the risks they associated with technologyData was clustered into five exploratory risk categories that informed subsequent refinement and co-design. Findings included beliefs, feelings and behavioursA video library of vignettes by and for older adults discussing their perceptions of risk with technology
Stage 2 – Explore and quantify surveysn = 706 older adults. The largest age category of participants was 70–74 (37.8%). There were significantly more female participants (69.2%)The study identified six refined categories of perceived digital risk. Older adults’ frequency of participating in digital activities was influenced by perceptions of risk. The findings from the survey and interviews formed a framework for codesign workshops based on persona enrichment and scenario mappingFacilitator guide and learning materials
Stage 3 – Codesign workshops with end usersn = 6 co-design workshops with older adults. One of the workshops was with CALD communitiesOlder adults have diverse levels of technology competencies and interests. The sources they use vary and so does the usefulness of these sourcesDigital confidence self-assessment tool risk-perception personas (including CALD-specific personas)
Stage 4 – Disseminate dissemination and implementation workshopsn = 4 workshops end-users and organisations working with older adults and technologyCo-design workshops and training sessions Shaping connections website (RMIT + U3A co-owned, creative commons license) Collaborative partnerships with ACCAN and city of Whittlesea
Source(s): Authors’ own work

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal