Table 9 Path analysis with... | Emerald Publishing

Table 9

Path analysis with sustainability-oriented resource availability as explanatory variable

		EU				UK				USA
Testing path	Label	Coefficient	Boot SE	CI lower	CI upper	Coefficient	Boot SE	CI lower	CI upper	Coefficient	Boot SE	CI lower	CI upper
Panel A: Path analysis with responsible innovation as a mediator
Direct effect
Sustainability-oriented resource availability → responsible innovation	a	1.02***	0.10	0.83	1.21	0.83***	0.09	0.65	1.01	1.00***	0.12	0.78	1.23
Responsible innovation → competitiveness	b	0.18***	0.02	0.14	0.22	0.17***	0.09	0.13	0.21	0.12***	0.03	0.05	0.18
Sustainability-oriented resource availability → competitiveness	c	0.27***	0.03	0.21	0.33	0.21***	0.03	0.14	0.27	0.19***	0.04	0.11	0.26
Indirect effect
Sustainability-oriented resource availability → responsible innovation → competitiveness	A * b	0.23***	0.08	0.06	0.40	0.27**	0.13	0.03	0.52	0.13	0.11	−0.08	0.35
Total effect
Sustainability-oriented resource availability → competitiveness	c + (a * b)	0.50***	0.09	0.32	0.67	0.48***	0.13	0.23	0.73	0.32***	0.12	0.08	0.55
Panel B: Path analysis with organisational support as a mediator
Direct effect
Sustainability-oriented resource availability → organisational support	e	0.22***	0.03	0.19	0.25	0.23***	0.01	0.20	0.25	0.24***	0.02	0.21	0.28
Organisational support → competitiveness	f	0.84***	0.12	0.60	1.08	0.64***	0.11	0.43	0.84	0.44***	0.14	0.17	0.71
Sustainability-oriented resource availability → competitiveness	d	0.28***	0.03	0.21	0.33	0.21***	0.03	0.14	0.27	0.19***	0.04	0.11	0.26
Indirect effect
Sustainability-oriented resource availability → organisational support → competitiveness	e * f	0.60	0.38	−0.15	1.36	0.62	0.41	−0.20	1.43	−0.49	0.46	−1.40	0.42
Total effect
Sustainability-oriented resource availability → competitiveness	d + (e * f)	0.88**	0.38	0.12	1.63	0.82**	0.42	0.00	1.64	−0.31	0.47	−1.22	0.61

		EU				UK				USA
Testing path	Label	Coefficient	Boot SE	CI lower	CI upper	Coefficient	Boot SE	CI lower	CI upper	Coefficient	Boot SE	CI lower	CI upper
Panel A: Path analysis with responsible innovation as a mediator
Direct effect
Sustainability-oriented resource availability → responsible innovation	a	1.02***	0.10	0.83	1.21	0.83***	0.09	0.65	1.01	1.00***	0.12	0.78	1.23
Responsible innovation → competitiveness	b	0.18***	0.02	0.14	0.22	0.17***	0.09	0.13	0.21	0.12***	0.03	0.05	0.18
Sustainability-oriented resource availability → competitiveness	c	0.27***	0.03	0.21	0.33	0.21***	0.03	0.14	0.27	0.19***	0.04	0.11	0.26
Indirect effect
Sustainability-oriented resource availability → responsible innovation → competitiveness	A * b	0.23***	0.08	0.06	0.40	0.27**	0.13	0.03	0.52	0.13	0.11	−0.08	0.35
Total effect
Sustainability-oriented resource availability → competitiveness	c + (a * b)	0.50***	0.09	0.32	0.67	0.48***	0.13	0.23	0.73	0.32***	0.12	0.08	0.55
Panel B: Path analysis with organisational support as a mediator
Direct effect
Sustainability-oriented resource availability → organisational support	e	0.22***	0.03	0.19	0.25	0.23***	0.01	0.20	0.25	0.24***	0.02	0.21	0.28
Organisational support → competitiveness	f	0.84***	0.12	0.60	1.08	0.64***	0.11	0.43	0.84	0.44***	0.14	0.17	0.71
Sustainability-oriented resource availability → competitiveness	d	0.28***	0.03	0.21	0.33	0.21***	0.03	0.14	0.27	0.19***	0.04	0.11	0.26
Indirect effect
Sustainability-oriented resource availability → organisational support → competitiveness	e * f	0.60	0.38	−0.15	1.36	0.62	0.41	−0.20	1.43	−0.49	0.46	−1.40	0.42
Total effect
Sustainability-oriented resource availability → competitiveness	d + (e * f)	0.88**	0.38	0.12	1.63	0.82**	0.42	0.00	1.64	−0.31	0.47	−1.22	0.61

Note(s):

The results of the path analysis with bootstrap procedure include all control variables; Latent variables have undergone a transformation process via the Box-Cox technique, Significance levels: *p < 0.10; **p < 0.05; ***p < 0.01

Source(s): Authors’ elaboration using Stata^® software

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable