Table 7

Handling endogeneity

Panel A. Lag of trust
VariablesDEVIATION1DEVIATION2DEVIATION3DEVIATION4
LAGTRUSTTL−0.003***−0.003***−0.001***−0.005***
(0.001)(0.001)(0.000)(0.001)
C and CONTROLESYESYESYESYES
YEAR_FEYESYESYESYES
IND_FEYESYESYESYES
Obs1,9761,9761,9761,976
R20.5900.4970.4840.454
Adj R20.5780.4820.4690.438
F49.14***33.68***31.97***28.39***
Panel B. Propensity score matching
VariablesDEVIATION1DEVIATION2DEVIATION3DEVIATION4DEVIATIONTL
TRUSTTL−0.004***−0.003***−0.001***−0.005***−0.018***
(0.001)(0.001)(0.000)(0.002)(0.004)
C and CONTROLESYESYESYESYESYES
YEAR_FEYESYESYESYESYES
IND_FEYESYESYESYESYES
Obs1,2781,2781,2781,2781,278
R20.5690.4960.4740.4780.515
Adj R20.5530.4770.4540.4580.496
F17.31***12.03***10.50***11.04***24.04***

Note(s): Panel A controls for potential endogeneity by including a lagged variable of trust language (LAGTRUSTTL) and examining its impact on information transparency. This approach helps in understanding the persistence or delayed effects of trust language. Panel B utilizes propensity score matching to control for selection bias and unobserved heterogeneity by comparing firms with similar characteristics but different levels of trust language usage. The regression models are adjusted accordingly to validate the robustness of the results obtained in other analyses. Standard errors in parentheses. All variables are defined in Appendix B. *p < 0.10, **p < 0.05, and ***p < 0.01

Source(s): Authors’ own work

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal