Employment management and labour-cost control at the LIBA Hotel before and after ADAPTA
| Dimension | Before ADAPTA: extreme-flexibility regime | With ADAPTA: consolidated labour-cost planning and control system |
|---|---|---|
| Predominant employment logic | Mainly numerical adjustment through temporary contracts and part-time work, with high turnover and strong seasonality | Maintenance of numerical flexibility, but with increasing incorporation of permanent and discontinuous permanent contracts supported by equivalent-person planning by department and day |
| Workforce planning | Manual planning based on middle managers' experience and historical occupancy information | Systematic planning based on bookings, standard staffing ratios and productivity indicators embedded in ADAPTA |
| Labour-cost control | Mainly ex post control through budgets and aggregate accounting monitoring of personnel costs | Near real-time control via “traffic lights” comparing equivalent persons with cost thresholds defined by the chain |
| Middle-management discretion | Broad scope to decide staffing levels and shift allocation within general budget limits | Reduced discretion: staffing requests that deviate from standard ratios must be justified and are subject to oversight |
| Role of the corporate HR department | Function focused on personnel administration and general application of flexibility policies shaped by the sectoral context | Function as institutional entrepreneur designing, promoting and supervising ADAPTA as a management control system for labour costs and for homogenising staffing criteria |
| Potential for transition towards regulated stability | Intensive use of temporariness and part-time work, with a weak informational basis for redesigning stable employment combinations | Availability of systematised data on occupancy, workloads and equivalent persons that can be reused to plan more sustainable combinations of permanent and discontinuous permanent employment after the 2021 reform |
| Dimension | Before ADAPTA: extreme-flexibility regime | With ADAPTA: consolidated labour-cost planning and control system |
|---|---|---|
| Predominant employment logic | Mainly numerical adjustment through temporary contracts and part-time work, with high turnover and strong seasonality | Maintenance of numerical flexibility, but with increasing incorporation of permanent and discontinuous permanent contracts supported by equivalent-person planning by department and day |
| Workforce planning | Manual planning based on middle managers' experience and historical occupancy information | Systematic planning based on bookings, standard staffing ratios and productivity indicators embedded in ADAPTA |
| Labour-cost control | Mainly ex post control through budgets and aggregate accounting monitoring of personnel costs | Near real-time control via “traffic lights” comparing equivalent persons with cost thresholds defined by the chain |
| Middle-management discretion | Broad scope to decide staffing levels and shift allocation within general budget limits | Reduced discretion: staffing requests that deviate from standard ratios must be justified and are subject to oversight |
| Role of the corporate HR department | Function focused on personnel administration and general application of flexibility policies shaped by the sectoral context | Function as institutional entrepreneur designing, promoting and supervising ADAPTA as a management control system for labour costs and for homogenising staffing criteria |
| Potential for transition towards regulated stability | Intensive use of temporariness and part-time work, with a weak informational basis for redesigning stable employment combinations | Availability of systematised data on occupancy, workloads and equivalent persons that can be reused to plan more sustainable combinations of permanent and discontinuous permanent employment after the 2021 reform |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.