Cross-sectional results
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VAR | Gov_quality = 1 | Gov_quality = 0 | Mono = 1 | Mono = 0 | Mshare = 1 | Mshare = 0 | Hage = 1 | Hage = 0 |
| GZW | 0.258*** | 0.037 | −0.009 | 0.202*** | 0.195*** | 0.017 | 0.214*** | 0.078 |
| (3.59) | (0.58) | (−0.11) | (3.58) | (2.95) | (0.27) | (3.31) | (1.17) | |
| Controls | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| Firm/year | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| Observations | 1,916 | 2,714 | 1,434 | 3,196 | 1,924 | 2,187 | 2,486 | 2,144 |
| R-squared | 0.2655 | 0.2246 | 0.2645 | 0.2279 | 0.2234 | 0.2035 | 0.2352 | 0.1832 |
| Diff | 0.221*** | −0.211*** | 0.178*** | 0.136** | ||||
| p-value | 0.0012 | 0.0016 | 0.0077 | 0.0428 | ||||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VAR | ||||||||
| 0.258*** | 0.037 | −0.009 | 0.202*** | 0.195*** | 0.017 | 0.214*** | 0.078 | |
| (3.59) | (0.58) | (−0.11) | (3.58) | (2.95) | (0.27) | (3.31) | (1.17) | |
| Controls | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| Firm/year | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
| Observations | 1,916 | 2,714 | 1,434 | 3,196 | 1,924 | 2,187 | 2,486 | 2,144 |
| 0.2655 | 0.2246 | 0.2645 | 0.2279 | 0.2234 | 0.2035 | 0.2352 | 0.1832 | |
| Diff | 0.221*** | −0.211*** | 0.178*** | 0.136** | ||||
| 0.0012 | 0.0016 | 0.0077 | 0.0428 | |||||
Note(s): Table 4 presents the results of the cross-sectional analysis, including cross-sectional analysis for government quality, industry competition, the proportion of state-owned shareholdings, and the age of board chairmen. Columns (1) and (2) show the influence of local governments' quality; Gov_quality = 1 (Gov_quality = 0) means higher (lower) quality. Columns (3) and (4) show the influence of industry competition; Mono = 1 (Mono = 0) means monopolistic (competitive) firms. Columns (5) and (6) show the influence of the proportion of state-owned shareholdings; Mshare = 1 (Mshare = 0) means a higher (lower) proportion of state-owned shareholdings. Columns (7) and (8) show the influence of the age of board chairmen; Hage = 1 (Hage = 0) means older (younger) board chairmen. The dependent variables are innovation measured by the natural logarithm of 1 plus the number of invention patent applications in year t+1 (Innovationt+1). The key independent variable is the establishment of local SASACs (GZW). We report in parentheses t-statistics based on standard errors that are robust to heteroskedasticity. ***p < 0.01; **p < 0.05; *p < 0.10; two-tailed test. See Appendix A for variable definitions
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.