Table 4

Cross-sectional results

(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)
VARGov_quality = 1Gov_quality = 0Mono = 1Mono = 0Mshare = 1Mshare = 0Hage = 1Hage = 0
GZW0.258***0.037−0.0090.202***0.195***0.0170.214***0.078
(3.59)(0.58)(−0.11)(3.58)(2.95)(0.27)(3.31)(1.17)
ControlsYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES
Firm/yearYESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES
Observations1,9162,7141,4343,1961,9242,1872,4862,144
R-squared0.26550.22460.26450.22790.22340.20350.23520.1832
Diff0.221***−0.211***0.178***0.136**
p-value0.00120.00160.00770.0428

Note(s): Table 4 presents the results of the cross-sectional analysis, including cross-sectional analysis for government quality, industry competition, the proportion of state-owned shareholdings, and the age of board chairmen. Columns (1) and (2) show the influence of local governments' quality; Gov_quality = 1 (Gov_quality = 0) means higher (lower) quality. Columns (3) and (4) show the influence of industry competition; Mono = 1 (Mono = 0) means monopolistic (competitive) firms. Columns (5) and (6) show the influence of the proportion of state-owned shareholdings; Mshare = 1 (Mshare = 0) means a higher (lower) proportion of state-owned shareholdings. Columns (7) and (8) show the influence of the age of board chairmen; Hage = 1 (Hage = 0) means older (younger) board chairmen. The dependent variables are innovation measured by the natural logarithm of 1 plus the number of invention patent applications in year t+1 (Innovationt+1). The key independent variable is the establishment of local SASACs (GZW). We report in parentheses t-statistics based on standard errors that are robust to heteroskedasticity. ***p < 0.01; **p < 0.05; *p < 0.10; two-tailed test. See Appendix A for variable definitions

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal