Table 12. Two-way ANOVA results –... | Emerald Publishing

Table 12.

Two-way ANOVA results – Generation × Bank type interaction

Variable	Effect	Sum of squares	df	Mean square	F	p-value	η²
Conscientiousness	Generation (G)	11.84	2	5.92	18.76	<0.001	0.118
	Bank type (B)	1.47	2	0.74	2.34	0.099	0.017
	G × B	2.16	4	0.54	1.71	0.148	0.024
	Error	86.51	275	0.31
Job security	Generation (G)	25.84	2	12.92	28.91	<0.001	0.171
	Bank type (B)	3.89	2	1.95	4.36	0.014	0.031
	G × B	4.92	4	1.23	2.75	0.029	0.038
	Error	122.96	275	0.45
Flexibility	Generation (G)	23.19	2	11.60	26.84	<0.001	0.160
	Bank type (B)	2.84	2	1.42	3.28	0.039	0.023
	G × B	4.67	4	1.17	2.70	0.031	0.038
	Error	118.86	275	0.43
Traditional commitment	Generation (G)	19.47	2	9.74	21.73	<0.001	0.134
	Bank type (B)	3.21	2	1.61	3.59	0.029	0.025
	G × B	5.14	4	1.29	2.87	0.023	0.040
	Error	123.31	275	0.45

Variable	Effect	Sum of squares	df	Mean square	F	p-value	η²
Conscientiousness	Generation (G)	11.84	2	5.92	18.76	<0.001	0.118
	Bank type (B)	1.47	2	0.74	2.34	0.099	0.017
	G × B	2.16	4	0.54	1.71	0.148	0.024
	Error	86.51	275	0.31
Job security	Generation (G)	25.84	2	12.92	28.91	<0.001	0.171
	Bank type (B)	3.89	2	1.95	4.36	0.014	0.031
	G × B	4.92	4	1.23	2.75	0.029	0.038
	Error	122.96	275	0.45
Flexibility	Generation (G)	23.19	2	11.60	26.84	<0.001	0.160
	Bank type (B)	2.84	2	1.42	3.28	0.039	0.023
	G × B	4.67	4	1.17	2.70	0.031	0.038
	Error	118.86	275	0.43
Traditional commitment	Generation (G)	19.47	2	9.74	21.73	<0.001	0.134
	Bank type (B)	3.21	2	1.61	3.59	0.029	0.025
	G × B	5.14	4	1.29	2.87	0.023	0.040
	Error	123.31	275	0.45

Source(s): Author’s own work