Table 4.

Analytical framework and results from the analysis

CriteriaNo.
Timeframe
2003 to 201115
2012 to 201960
2020 to 2025134
Total209
Location
By geography
Africa13
Asia-Pacific54
Europe57
Middle East19
The Americas50
Multiple9
Worldwide7
Total209
By economic development
Developed countries114
Developing countries81
Multiple14
Total209
Risk type
Business5
Financial17
ESG: Overall1
ESG: Environmental28
ESG: Social9
ESG: Governance3
IT11
Overall135
Total209
RD regulation
Mandatory28
Voluntary121
Both60
Total209
RD dimension
Volume97
Feature31
Multiple74
Multidimensional index7
Total209
Research method
Experimental7
Mixed3
Qualitative9
Quantitative190
Total209
Data source
Annual report171
Other32
Multiple6
Total209
Data collection
Manually106
Automated62
AI tools24
Multiple17
Total209
Research question
RD choices16
Determinants83
External25
Internal33
Multiple25
Consequences71
Capital markets54
Operating outcomes7
Accounting and auditing4
Others3
Multiple3
Multiple questions39
Total209
Research finding
Positive87
Negative20
Neutral13
Mixed73
Not relevant16
Total209
Research implication
Micro14
Meso8
Macro80
Multiple91
N/A16
Total209
Note(s):

This table outlines the analytical framework and shows how the 209 RD studies are distributed across key criteria, including timeframe, location (by geography and economic development), risk type, RD regulation, RD dimension, research method, data source, data collection, research question, research finding and research implication

Source(s): Authors’ own work

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal