Table 3

Salience of retirement pathway types in the reviewed literature

Pathway typeNumber of studies (n = 32)Typical datasetsDominant institutional contexts
Gradual/phased retirement (including reduction of hours, phased exit)11HRS, SHARE, ELSA, GSOEPLiberal and corporatist regimes with flexible labour markets and options for part-time retirement (USA, UK, Germany, Netherlands)
Bridge employment (employment after leaving career job but before full retirement)10HRS, CPS, BHPS, SHARECountries with flexible employment structures and weak restrictions on post-retirement work (especially USA, UK)
Crisp/full retirement (direct transition from full-time work to retirement)9HRS, SHARE, national panel surveysInstitutional systems with clearly defined statutory retirement ages and pension eligibility rules
Reversible pathways/unretirement (return to work after retirement)7HRS, ELSA, longitudinal panel surveysLiberal labour markets enabling post-retirement employment (USA, UK)
Involuntary or alternative exits (unemployment, disability, inactivity before retirement)11Register data, SHARE, national pension registersWelfare regimes with multiple benefit channels for labour-market exit (e.g. disability pensions in Finland, Netherlands, Germany)
Joint retirement trajectories (couple-based retirement coordination)2HRS, household panel surveysDual-earner household contexts, mostly analysed in the USA
Source(s): Authors’ own synthesis based on the 32 reviewed studies

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal