Dynamic analysis
| Variables | LS | LN_LS |
|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | |
| RM* PC0 | −0.0230** | −0.1536* |
| (−2.141) | (−1.736) | |
| RM* PC1 | −0.0235** | −0.1750** |
| (−2.137) | (−1.999) | |
| RM* PC2 | −0.0207* | −0.1906** |
| (−1.972) | (−2.413) | |
| RM* PC3 | −0.0087 | −0.0448 |
| (−0.984) | (−0.735) | |
| RM* PC4 | −0.0095 | −0.0239 |
| (−1.380) | (−0.494) | |
| PC0 | 0.0038 | −0.1298 |
| (0.302) | (−1.310) | |
| PC1 | 0.0070 | −0.0849 |
| (0.700) | (−1.024) | |
| PC2 | 0.0058 | −0.0635 |
| (0.722) | (−0.916) | |
| PC3 | 0.0002 | −0.0791 |
| (0.042) | (−1.558) | |
| PC4 | −0.0015 | −0.0730* |
| (−0.421) | (−1.778) | |
| CONTROLS | Yes | Yes |
| CONSTANT | −0.3037 | −4.3203** |
| (−1.143) | (−2.188) | |
| YEAR FE | Yes | Yes |
| FIRM FE | Yes | Yes |
| N | 924 | 924 |
| Adj. R2 | 0.580 | 0.607 |
| Variables | ||
|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | |
| −0.0087 | −0.0448 | |
| (−0.984) | (−0.735) | |
| −0.0095 | −0.0239 | |
| (−1.380) | (−0.494) | |
| 0.0038 | −0.1298 | |
| (0.302) | (−1.310) | |
| 0.0070 | −0.0849 | |
| (0.700) | (−1.024) | |
| 0.0058 | −0.0635 | |
| (0.722) | (−0.916) | |
| 0.0002 | −0.0791 | |
| (0.042) | (−1.558) | |
| −0.0015 | −0.0730* | |
| (−0.421) | (−1.778) | |
| Yes | Yes | |
| −0.3037 | −4.3203** | |
| (−1.143) | (−2.188) | |
| Yes | Yes | |
| Yes | Yes | |
| 924 | 924 | |
| 0.580 | 0.607 |
Note(s): This table presents the regression results of the dynamic analysis. The dependent variables are labor share (LS) and the logarithmically converted form of labor share (LN_LS). See Appendix A for variable definitions. Our sample includes 924 firm-year observations. Year and firm fixed effects are included. The t-statistics based on robust standard errors clustered by firms are presented in parentheses beneath each estimate. ***, ** and * indicate two-tailed statistical significance at the 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.