Comparative analysis of existing methods in Mpox prediction and their challenges
| Related work | Year | Dataset | Classification | Algorithm | Contribution | Unaddressed challenges/Reasons for limitation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Campana, Colussi, Delmastro, Mascetti, and Pagani (2024) | 2024 | MCSI | Multiclass | MobileNetV3 | Introduced new dataset of skin images (lesion/non-lesion) for Mpox detection | Limited optimization for edge deployment and latency-sensitive applications |
| Ahsan et al. (2024) | 2024 | MDS22 | Multiclass | M-ResNet50 | Investigated Mpox diagnosis using CNN with transfer and federated learning | Insufficient labeling diversity and class ambiguity hinder generalization |
| Ahsan et al. (2023) | 2023 | MDS22 | Multiclass | Xception | Applied GRA-TLA for optimization and CNN enhancement | Inability to capture fine-grained lesion variations and spatial dependencies |
| Bala et al. (2023) | 2023 | MSID | Multiclass | M-DenseNet201 | Proposed MonkeyNet for Mpox image classification | Failure to emphasize discriminative lesion regions reduces precision |
| Nayak et al. (2023) | 2023 | MSLD | Binary | M-ResNet18 | Detection of Mpox lesions using deep learning | Poor performance under racial and illumination variations |
| Rabie and Saleh (2023) | 2023 | MPX-Data, MPPD | Multiclass/Binary | SNB, LKNN, DLC | Ensemble classification for integrated AMDS Mpox system | Lack of deep or hybrid ensemble models limits robustness |
| Saleh and Rabie (2023) | 2023 | MPX-Data | Binary | IBCO, WNB, WKNN, LSTM | Human Mpox classification using hybrid traditional methods | Non-scalable for mobile or real-time deployment |
| Sahin, Oztel, and Yolcu Oztel (2022) | 2022 | MSLD | Binary | MobileNetV2 | Human Mpox classification with transfer learning | Fails to benchmark against state-of-the-art CNNs or transformers |
| Sitaula and Shahi (2022) | 2022 | MDS22 | Multiclass | Comparative DL models | Compared multiple pre-trained models for Mpox | Inefficient inference and high computational demand |
| Thieme et al. (2023) | 2023 | MPXV | Binary | CNN | Binary Mpox detection using CNNs | Simple CNN backbone limits adaptability to diverse lesion types |
| Yadav and Qidwai (2024) | 2024 | MSLD | Binary | M-ResNet50 + MXGBoost | RN-50-ZCA model enhances feature extraction | Lack of regularization and dataset diversity causing overfitting |
| Asif, Zhao, Tang, Zhu, and Zhao (2023) | 2023 | MSLD | Binary | DenseNet201, MobileNet, DenseNet169 | MO-WAE model integrating metaheuristic optimization | Unbalanced data distribution affects reproducibility and model stability |
| Related work | Year | Dataset | Classification | Algorithm | Contribution | Unaddressed challenges/Reasons for limitation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | MCSI | Multiclass | MobileNetV3 | Introduced new dataset of skin images (lesion/non-lesion) for Mpox detection | Limited optimization for edge deployment and latency-sensitive applications | |
| 2024 | MDS22 | Multiclass | M-ResNet50 | Investigated Mpox diagnosis using CNN with transfer and federated learning | Insufficient labeling diversity and class ambiguity hinder generalization | |
| 2023 | MDS22 | Multiclass | Xception | Applied GRA-TLA for optimization and CNN enhancement | Inability to capture fine-grained lesion variations and spatial dependencies | |
| 2023 | MSID | Multiclass | M-DenseNet201 | Proposed MonkeyNet for Mpox image classification | Failure to emphasize discriminative lesion regions reduces precision | |
| 2023 | MSLD | Binary | M-ResNet18 | Detection of Mpox lesions using deep learning | Poor performance under racial and illumination variations | |
| 2023 | MPX-Data, MPPD | Multiclass/Binary | SNB, LKNN, DLC | Ensemble classification for integrated AMDS Mpox system | Lack of deep or hybrid ensemble models limits robustness | |
| 2023 | MPX-Data | Binary | IBCO, WNB, WKNN, LSTM | Human Mpox classification using hybrid traditional methods | Non-scalable for mobile or real-time deployment | |
| 2022 | MSLD | Binary | MobileNetV2 | Human Mpox classification with transfer learning | Fails to benchmark against state-of-the-art CNNs or transformers | |
| 2022 | MDS22 | Multiclass | Comparative DL models | Compared multiple pre-trained models for Mpox | Inefficient inference and high computational demand | |
| 2023 | MPXV | Binary | CNN | Binary Mpox detection using CNNs | Simple CNN backbone limits adaptability to diverse lesion types | |
| 2024 | MSLD | Binary | M-ResNet50 + MXGBoost | RN-50-ZCA model enhances feature extraction | Lack of regularization and dataset diversity causing overfitting | |
| 2023 | MSLD | Binary | DenseNet201, MobileNet, DenseNet169 | MO-WAE model integrating metaheuristic optimization | Unbalanced data distribution affects reproducibility and model stability |
Note(s): MCSI: Mpox Close Skin Images; MDS22: Monkeypoxdataset-2022; MPXV: Monkeypox Virus; MPX-Data: Monkeypox-Data; MSLD: Monkeypox Skin Lesion Dataset; MSID: Monkeypox Skin Images Dataset; M-DenseNet201: Modified DenseNet-201; M-ResNet18: Modified ResNet-18; M-XGBoost: Modified XGBoost; M-ResNet50: Modified ResNet50; CNN: Convolutional Neural Network; LSTM: Long Short-Term Memory; WKNN: Weighted K-Nearest Neighbors; WNB: Weighted Naïve Bayes; IBCO: Improved Binary Chimp Optimization; AMDS: Accurate Monkeypox Diagnosing Strategy; LKNN: Layered K-Nearest Neighbors; DLC: Deep Learning Classifier; GRA-TLA: Generalization and Regularization-based Transfer Learning; MO-WAE: Metaheuristic-Optimization-based Weighted Average Ensemble; RN-50-ZCA: Residual Network-50-Zero Phase Component Analysis
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.