Table 6.

Regression result of high- vs low-risk firms (H3)

VariablesLow-risk firmsHigh-risk firms
(1)(2)(3)(4)(1)(2)(3)(4)
NUM KAMNUM KAMWORD KAMWORD KAMNUM KAMNUM KAMWORD KAMWORD KAM
lnProx_KM−0.067** (0.028)−0.066* (0.034)−0.043 (0.030)−0.018 (0.032)
lnProx_Min−0.079** (0.031)−0.084** (0.037)−0.054 (0.037)−0.032 (0.040)
Constant0.404 (0.914)0.225 (0.922)5.7*** (1.092)5.46*** (1.102)−0.50 (0.792)−0.59 (0.794)4.6*** (0.835)4.55*** (0.836)
Observation233233233233232232232232
Adjusted R20.150.150.140.140.190.190.170.17
ControlsYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Year FEYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Industry FEYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Prob > F0.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000
Note(s):

This table reports the cross-sectional results showing the impact of auditor−client geographic proximity on KAMs disclosures between low- vs high-risk firms. Variable definitions are provided in Table 2. ***p < 0.01, **p < 0.05, *p < 0.10. Standard errors are reported in parentheses

Source(s): Authors’ own calculations

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal