Discriminant validity – HTMT ratios
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. WBHRM | – | |||||
| 2. Burnout | 0.798 | – | ||||
| 3. Turnover intentions | 0.689 | 0.872 | – | |||
| 4. Leadership support | 0.571 | 0.522 | 0.496 | – | ||
| 5. Surface acting | 0.438 | 0.610 | 0.421 | 0.279 | – | |
| 6. Resilience | 0.150 | 0.261 | 0.337 | 0.153 | 0.350 | – |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. WBHRM | – | |||||
| 2. Burnout | 0.798 | – | ||||
| 3. Turnover intentions | 0.689 | 0.872 | – | |||
| 4. Leadership support | 0.571 | 0.522 | 0.496 | – | ||
| 5. Surface acting | 0.438 | 0.610 | 0.421 | 0.279 | – | |
| 6. Resilience | 0.150 | 0.261 | 0.337 | 0.153 | 0.350 | – |
Note(s): HTMT = heterotrait-monotrait ratio. All values < 0.90; 14 of 15 pairs <0.85. The HTMT value of 0.872 between burnout and turnover intentions, while exceeding 0.85, is theoretically expected given burnout's role as a proximal predictor of turnover (Swider and Zimmerman, 2010) and does not indicate inadequate discriminant validity
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.