The key roles
| Role | National role conception (NRC) | Role performance | Role prescription |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mediator | Turkey as a pragmatic diplomatic actor capable of engaging conflicting parties and facilitating dialogue | Shuttle diplomacy with regional actors; hosting Hamas representatives; engagement with Qatar and Egypt on ceasefire efforts; humanitarian diplomacy | Limited recognition by Israel and Western actors due to concerns over impartiality; partial acceptance by Hamas and some regional actors, but insufficient to enable effective mediation |
| Regional leader | Turkey as a central regional power with moral authority and political influence in Middle Eastern crises | Strong rhetorical condemnation of Israeli actions; leadership discourse on Gaza; positioning Turkey as a voice for regional public opinion | Positive resonance among regional publics and some Middle Eastern actors; skepticism from rival regional powers and limited acknowledgment by global actors of Turkey's leadership claim |
| Protector of Palestinians | Turkey as a normative actor defending Palestinian rights and humanitarian principles | Public advocacy for Gaza; humanitarian aid delivery; suspension of high-level political engagement with Israel | Strong validation by domestic audiences and Palestinian actors; limited endorsement by Western governments, which prioritized de-escalation and humanitarian access over normative alignment |
| Strategic balancer | Turkey as an autonomous middle power avoiding full alignment with competing regional blocs | Maintaining economic ties with Israel; avoiding military escalation; distancing from the Iran-led “Axis of Resistance” while sustaining dialogue | Conditional acceptance by Western actors; cautious regional recognition amid uncertainty over Turkey's strategic orientation |
| Guarantor (aspirational) | Turkey as a potential security guarantor in post-conflict arrangements | Proposals for international protection mechanisms; calls for multilateral guarantees for Gaza (limited role recognition) | Minimal recognition from key international actors; lack of institutional and great-power support constrained role realization |
| Role | National role conception (NRC) | Role performance | Role prescription |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mediator | Turkey as a pragmatic diplomatic actor capable of engaging conflicting parties and facilitating dialogue | Shuttle diplomacy with regional actors; hosting Hamas representatives; engagement with Qatar and Egypt on ceasefire efforts; humanitarian diplomacy | Limited recognition by Israel and Western actors due to concerns over impartiality; partial acceptance by Hamas and some regional actors, but insufficient to enable effective mediation |
| Regional leader | Turkey as a central regional power with moral authority and political influence in Middle Eastern crises | Strong rhetorical condemnation of Israeli actions; leadership discourse on Gaza; positioning Turkey as a voice for regional public opinion | Positive resonance among regional publics and some Middle Eastern actors; skepticism from rival regional powers and limited acknowledgment by global actors of Turkey's leadership claim |
| Protector of Palestinians | Turkey as a normative actor defending Palestinian rights and humanitarian principles | Public advocacy for Gaza; humanitarian aid delivery; suspension of high-level political engagement with Israel | Strong validation by domestic audiences and Palestinian actors; limited endorsement by Western governments, which prioritized de-escalation and humanitarian access over normative alignment |
| Strategic balancer | Turkey as an autonomous middle power avoiding full alignment with competing regional blocs | Maintaining economic ties with Israel; avoiding military escalation; distancing from the Iran-led “Axis of Resistance” while sustaining dialogue | Conditional acceptance by Western actors; cautious regional recognition amid uncertainty over Turkey's strategic orientation |
| Guarantor (aspirational) | Turkey as a potential security guarantor in post-conflict arrangements | Proposals for international protection mechanisms; calls for multilateral guarantees for Gaza (limited role recognition) | Minimal recognition from key international actors; lack of institutional and great-power support constrained role realization |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.