Comparison between the patriarchal logics and ethics of care
| OSCM governed by patriarchal logics | Ethics of care | |
|---|---|---|
| Root | Capitalism (Kothari et al., 2019; Quijano, 2000) | Feminist morality (Gilligan, 1982; Noddings, 1984) |
| Purpose | Wealth accumulation (LeBaron, 2015) | Collective well-being (Held, 2005; Tronto, 2013) |
| Objectives | Maximise profit, efficiency, flexibility and responsiveness (Montabon et al., 2016; Pagell and Wilhelm, 2025; Wiengarten et al., 2021) |
|
| Mechanisms* | Non-exhaustive list
| Contextual moral reasoning: Grounded in the particular circumstances, histories and needs of those involved, the Ethics of Care attends to the irreducible particularity of human relations over abstract universal principles through
|
| OSCM governed by patriarchal logics | Ethics of care | |
|---|---|---|
| Root | Capitalism ( | Feminist morality ( |
| Purpose | Wealth accumulation ( | Collective well-being ( |
| Objectives | Maximise profit, efficiency, flexibility and responsiveness ( | Acknowledge vulnerability ( Attend to relations ( Avoid hurt ( |
| Mechanisms | Non-exhaustive list Cost reduction tactics Predatory purchasing practices Flexible on-demand, small orders towards upstream Informal/temporal labour practice Penalty-based supplier management ( | Contextual moral reasoning: Grounded in the particular circumstances, histories and needs of those involved, the Ethics of Care attends to the irreducible particularity of human relations over abstract universal principles through |
Underlined are the ethical values for each phase of care Tronto (2013)
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.