Table 3.

Pairwise post hoc comparisons for significant Kruskal-Wallis test using Dunn’s method

Paired independent variablesDependent variableMean differenceSig.
Woman transactional- Man transactionalEnjoy serving commander−7.350.559
Improve cadet performance−24.120.044*
Optimistic reception−2.600.834
Likeability composite0.870.948
Woman transactional- Woman transformationalEnjoy serving commander26.810.032*
Improve cadet performance17.050.151
Optimistic reception34.640.005**
Likeability composite25.090.056
Woman transactional- Man transformationalEnjoy serving commander32.280.010**
Improve cadet performance38.200.002**
Optimistic reception50.87<0.001**
Likeability composite31.780.017*
Woman transformational- Man transformationalEnjoy serving commander−5.470.662
Improve cadet performance−21.150.077
Optimistic reception−16.220.190
Likeability composite−6.690.612
Man transactional- Woman transformationalEnjoy serving commander19.460.118
Improve cadet performance−7.070.551
Optimistic reception32.050.009**
Likeability composite25.960.048*
Man transactional- Man transformationalEnjoy serving commander24.930.048*
Improve cadet performance14.080.243
Optimistic reception48.27<0.001**
Likeability composite32.650.014*
Note(s):

*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. Each row tests the null hypothesis that the Sample 1 and Sample 2 distributions are the same. Asymptotic significances (2-sided tests) are displayed. The significance level is 0.050

[ViewLarge]
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal