Table 1 Fuzzy-set qualitative...

Table 1

Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis findings for attitude toward in-home service consumption

	Solutions
Condition	1a	1b	2a	2b	2c	3a	3b	3c
WFH factors as push factors
TI		•	⊗	⊗	⊗	•	•	•
WIL		•	⊗	⊗	⊗	⊗	⊗	⊗
Individual motivations as pull factors
HM	●	●	⊗	⊗	●	●	●	⊗
CM	•			•		•	•	⊗
FM	●	●	⊗	●	●	⊗	●	⊗
Conditional factors as mooring factors
HQ	●	●	●	⊗	●	●	⊗	●
BC	•	⊗	•	•	•	⊗	⊗	⊗
*Consistency*	0.958	0.922	0.822	0.953	0.967	0.906	0.948	0.831
*Raw coverage*	0.427	0.255	0.264	0.366	0.256	0.209	0.230	0.219
*Unique coverage*	0.049	0.028	0.005	0.014	0.012	0.010	0.024	0.008
*Overall solution consistency*			0.815
*Overall solution coverage*			0.632

	Solutions
Condition	1a	1b	2a	2b	2c	3a	3b	3c
WFH factors as push factors
TI		•	⊗	⊗	⊗	•	•	•
WIL		•	⊗	⊗	⊗	⊗	⊗	⊗
Individual motivations as pull factors
HM	●	●	⊗	⊗	●	●	●	⊗
CM	•			•		•	•	⊗
FM	●	●	⊗	●	●	⊗	●	⊗
Conditional factors as mooring factors
HQ	●	●	●	⊗	●	●	⊗	●
BC	•	⊗	•	•	•	⊗	⊗	⊗
Consistency	0.958	0.922	0.822	0.953	0.967	0.906	0.948	0.831
Raw coverage	0.427	0.255	0.264	0.366	0.256	0.209	0.230	0.219
Unique coverage	0.049	0.028	0.005	0.014	0.012	0.010	0.024	0.008
Overall solution consistency			0.815
Overall solution coverage			0.632

Note(s):

BC = Boundary control; TI = Techno-invasion; WIL = Work-induced loneliness; HM = Hedonic motivation; CM = Convenience motivation; FM = Functional motivation; and HQ = Home quality; the presence of a condition is indicated by black circles ●. The absence of a condition is indicated by circle with “x” ⊗. Blank space indicates “don’t care condition,” while large and small circles denote core and peripheral conditions, respectively

Source(s): authors’ own work

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable