Table 2 Fuzzy-set qualitative...

Table 2

Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis findings for intentions to use in-home services

	Solutions
Condition	1	2a	2b	2c	3a	3b	3c	3d
*WFH factors as push factors*
TI		⊗	⊗	⊗	●	●	●	●
WIL		⊗	⊗	⊗	⊗	⊗	⊗	•
*Individual motivations as pull factors*
HM	●	⊗	⊗	●	●	●	⊗	●
CM	●	●	●		●	●	⊗
FM	●	⊗	●	●	⊗	●	⊗	●
*Conditional factors as mooring factors*
HQ	•	•	⊗	•	●	⊗	●	●
BC	•	•	•	•	⊗	⊗	⊗	⊗
*Consistency*	0.919	0.899	0.942	0.929	0.909	0.955	0.844	0.905
*Raw coverage*	0.411	0.238	0.250	0.358	0.210	0.233	0.223	0.251
*Unique coverage*	0.041	0.012	0.016	0.017	0.010	0.026	0.023	0.027
*Overall solution consistency*			0.838
*Overall solution coverage*			0.598

	Solutions
Condition	1	2a	2b	2c	3a	3b	3c	3d
WFH factors as push factors
TI		⊗	⊗	⊗	●	●	●	●
WIL		⊗	⊗	⊗	⊗	⊗	⊗	•
Individual motivations as pull factors
HM	●	⊗	⊗	●	●	●	⊗	●
CM	●	●	●		●	●	⊗
FM	●	⊗	●	●	⊗	●	⊗	●
Conditional factors as mooring factors
HQ	•	•	⊗	•	●	⊗	●	●
BC	•	•	•	•	⊗	⊗	⊗	⊗
Consistency	0.919	0.899	0.942	0.929	0.909	0.955	0.844	0.905
Raw coverage	0.411	0.238	0.250	0.358	0.210	0.233	0.223	0.251
Unique coverage	0.041	0.012	0.016	0.017	0.010	0.026	0.023	0.027
Overall solution consistency			0.838
Overall solution coverage			0.598

Note(s):

BC = Boundary control; TI = Techno-invasion; WIL = Work-induced loneliness; HM = Hedonic motivation; CM = Convenience motivation; FM = Functional motivation; and HQ = Home quality; the presence of a condition is indicated by black circles ●. The absence of a condition is indicated by circle with “x” ⊗. Blank space indicates “don’t care condition,” while large and small circles denote core and peripheral conditions, respectively

Source(s): Authors’ own work

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable