Table 1 Profile of the sampled...

Table 1

Profile of the sampled municipalities (n = 124)

Province		Population		SUAP governance		Years of SUAP digitalization		N. Of SUAP procedures per year
Gorizia	11.29%	0–999	33.87%	Associated	83.87%	<10 YEARS	20.97%	0–100	12.90%
Pordenone	17.74%	1,000–1,999	31.45%	Delegated*	0.81%	10 YEARS	14.52%	101–250	7.26%
Udine	69.35%	2,000–2,999	21.77%	Autonomous	15.32%	5 YEARS	52.42%	251–500	24.19%
Trieste	1.61%	3,000–3,999	8.87%			1 YEAR	8.06%	501–1,000	25.81%
		4,000–4,999	4.03%			N/A	4.03%	>1,000	29.84%

Province		Population		SUAP governance		Years of SUAP digitalization		N. Of SUAP procedures per year
Gorizia	11.29%	0–999	33.87%	Associated	83.87%	<10 YEARS	20.97%	0–100	12.90%
Pordenone	17.74%	1,000–1,999	31.45%	Delegated*	0.81%	10 YEARS	14.52%	101–250	7.26%
Udine	69.35%	2,000–2,999	21.77%	Autonomous	15.32%	5 YEARS	52.42%	251–500	24.19%
Trieste	1.61%	3,000–3,999	8.87%			1 YEAR	8.06%	501–1,000	25.81%
		4,000–4,999	4.03%			N/A	4.03%	>1,000	29.84%

Note(s): *Delegated indicates that SUAP management is fully assigned and managed by another institution (e.g. Chambers of Commerce). It is treated as associated in subsequent analyses

Source(s): Authors’ own work

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable