Summary of key concepts in this research and their connections to similar concepts in the literature
| Definition in this study | Related concepts | |
|---|---|---|
| Relational interface | Relational interfaces refer to the touchpoints through which the resource bases of buyer and supplier are connected by exchange activities (Araujo et al., 1999) | We found several studies referencing Araujo et al. (1999) with different terms like buyer-supplier interface (Holma et al., 2022), supplier interfaces (Ferreira and Lind, 2023) and organizational interface (Sundquist and Melander, 2021)Resource interface: Specific contact points between two resources defined along relevant technical, economic, and social dimensions” (Baraldi, 2003, p. 18) |
| Relational friction | Results of the destabilizing forces or movements toward heavy resource ties, activity links or actor bonds occur as a result of changes within the established relational interfaces of actors (authors’ definition), such as seeking innovative processes in standardized traditional environments like public procurement | Friction (actor–network perspective): Performative tension between actors and networks while a new resource or process is adopted in a network (Mattila, 2017)Resource friction: Result of any destabilizing force or movement of resources in relation to other interconnected resources (Håkansson and Waluszewski, 2002a, 2002b)Network tension: Discomfort generated by ambiguity that can have various sources, such as contradictory and unclear communications, the absence of communication, a lack of sufficient planning, and incongruity between actors’ aims (Tóth et al., 2018) |
| Coping activities | Activities to reduce the effects of the relational frictions between actors | Coping strategies: Approaches to resolve frictions and misalignments between actors (Mattila, 2017)Lubricants: Elements that reduce friction in resource contact points (Hauke-Lopes et al., 2023) |
| Friction distribution | Relational frictions can trigger other frictions, which we categorized by elaborating on (Hoholm and Olsen, 2012): Direct frictions: Relational frictions occurring at the buyer–seller interfaces of our focus Indirect frictions: Relational frictions that arise with interfaces involving other actors in the network | Friction effects (direct and indirect): They can be direct (local) or distributed across resource interfaces and affect other resources (Hoholm and Olsen, 2012) |
| Definition in this study | Related concepts | |
|---|---|---|
| Relational interface | Relational interfaces refer to the touchpoints through which the resource bases of buyer and supplier are connected by exchange activities ( | We found several studies referencing |
| Relational friction | Results of the destabilizing forces or movements toward heavy resource ties, activity links or actor bonds occur as a result of changes within the established relational interfaces of actors (authors’ definition), such as seeking innovative processes in standardized traditional environments like public procurement | |
| Coping activities | Activities to reduce the effects of the relational frictions between actors | |
| Friction distribution | Relational frictions can trigger other frictions, which we categorized by elaborating on ( |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.