Table 7

Overview of biases

Categories of biasesSub-bias typeFrequencyExemplary articlesCore findings
Algorithm to userAlgorithmic bias11Schultz and Fabozzi (2022) AI and machine learning in banking and financial institutions can perpetuate bias, particularly in lending and credit decisions
Evaluation bias8Amaral et al. (2023) AI and machine learning can introduce biases in finance, but when evaluated through risk-based pricing, they can improve profits and provide traditionally marginalized customers with access to loans
User interaction bias3Liu et al. (2024) AI technology in the banking industry may reduce the positive impacts of Chinese clients' perceptions of Guanxi on their engagement, reflecting attitudinal differences between bankers and clients
Emergent bias3Tigges et al. (2024) Adoption of AI and machine learning in banking and financial institutions has the potential to enhance credit accessibility but also raises concerns about bias and discrimination
Data to algorithmSampling bias6Tserng et al. (2011) An enforced support vector machine-based model (ESVM) outperforms the traditional logistic regression model in predicting construction contractor default risk, by correcting sampling bias from class imbalance
Representation bias6Repetto (2025) Multicriteria interpretability-driven deep learning technique has been developed to create robust AI models for credit risk prediction, overcoming biases resulting from data scarcity in financial institutions
Measurement bias8Shi et al. (2023) Multi-step convex optimization approach based on MSW-LASSO improves parameter estimation in high-dimensional index tracking, reducing measurement bias in AI-driven financial modeling
Linking bias1Packin and Lev-Aretz (2024) AI and machine learning in banking and financial institutions can perpetuate bias through faulty inputs, proxy discrimination and surveillance capitalism
Omitted variable bias1Bockel-Rickermann et al. (2025) Advanced machine learning methods can improve the estimation of individual bid responses in banking, especially when addressing confounding bias in observational data
User to dataAggregation bias1Zhang et al. (2022) Meta-algorithms can reduce the risk of choosing wrong experts in financial environments, especially when base expert algorithms are sensitive to certain environments or parameters, mitigating the bias in expert selection
Social bias3Tubadji et al. (2021) Consumers' adoption of robo-advisory AI in banking is influenced by cultural norms, social capital and trust
Behavioral bias14Athota et al. (2023) AI and machine learning can help reduce cognitive biases in financial planning, but there is uncertainty about whether financial planners will fully rely on AI-based decision making
Content production bias1Gurdgiev and O'Loughlin (2020) AI and machine learning can be used to detect and mitigate biases in investor sentiment data, which is crucial for financial institutions to make informed decisions in cryptocurrency markets
Historical bias2Bono et al. (2021) Machine-learning models in credit scoring are more accurate overall and do as well as traditional models on relevant fairness criteria, but they may perpetuate or amplify human biases from the past
Population bias1Li and Goel (2025) AI and machine learning systems used in banking and financial institutions can exhibit biases that may lead to discriminatory outcomes

Note(s): The reported frequencies are based on 65 articles. Total frequency exceeds the total number of articles since certain articles address more than one bias

Source(s): Created by authors

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal