Heckman's (1979) two-stage regression results of association between presence of a sustainability committee and CSR performance
| Panel A: Heckman (1979) first-stage probit regression results | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dependent variable = SUSTCOM | |||
| Coefficient | z-statistics | p-value | |
| PROPCOM | 10.472 | 10.160 | 0.000*** |
| FSIZE | 0.244 | 9.080 | 0.000*** |
| LEV | 0.409 | 2.710 | 0.007*** |
| MB | −0.208 | −4.750 | 0.000*** |
| ROA | 0.118 | 0.520 | 0.605 |
| CGOV | 0.112 | 1.390 | 0.164 |
| FIN | −0.245 | −1.530 | 0.118 |
| COMPET | −0.042 | −3.780 | 0.000*** |
| GLOBAL | 0.009 | 0.120 | 0.905 |
| LIQUID | 0.059 | 2.970 | 0.003*** |
| LITG | −0.207 | −1.650 | 0.099* |
| FAGE | 0.289 | 4.990 | 0.000*** |
| Intercept | −4.129 | −15.520 | 0.000*** |
| Year Fixed Effects | Yes | ||
| Industry Fixed Effects | Yes | ||
| Observations | 27,966 | ||
| Pseudo R-squared | 0.227 | ||
| Area under ROC curve | 0.849 | ||
| Panel A: | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dependent variable = SUSTCOM | |||
| Coefficient | |||
| 10.472 | 10.160 | 0.000*** | |
| 0.244 | 9.080 | 0.000*** | |
| 0.409 | 2.710 | 0.007*** | |
| −0.208 | −4.750 | 0.000*** | |
| 0.118 | 0.520 | 0.605 | |
| 0.112 | 1.390 | 0.164 | |
| −0.245 | −1.530 | 0.118 | |
| −0.042 | −3.780 | 0.000*** | |
| 0.009 | 0.120 | 0.905 | |
| 0.059 | 2.970 | 0.003*** | |
| −0.207 | −1.650 | 0.099* | |
| 0.289 | 4.990 | 0.000*** | |
| Intercept | −4.129 | −15.520 | 0.000*** |
| Year Fixed Effects | Yes | ||
| Industry Fixed Effects | Yes | ||
| Observations | 27,966 | ||
| Pseudo | 0.227 | ||
| Area under ROC curve | 0.849 | ||
| Panel B: Heckman (1979) second-stage regression results | |
|---|---|
| Dependent variable = CSR_PERFt+1 | |
| Model (1) | |
| SUSTCOM | 0.037*** |
| (2.898) | |
| IMR | 0.135*** |
| (5.513) | |
| Constant | −0.360*** |
| (−3.883) | |
| Control variables | Yes |
| Year fixed effects | Yes |
| Industry fixed effects | Yes |
| Observations | 27,966 |
| R-squared | 0.299 |
| F-statistic | 60.189*** |
| Panel B: | |
|---|---|
| Dependent variable = | |
| Model (1) | |
| 0.037*** | |
| (2.898) | |
| 0.135*** | |
| (5.513) | |
| Constant | −0.360*** |
| (−3.883) | |
| Control variables | Yes |
| Year fixed effects | Yes |
| Industry fixed effects | Yes |
| Observations | 27,966 |
| 0.299 | |
| 60.189*** | |
Note(s): This table shows Heckman's (1979) two-stage regression results of the association between the presence of a sustainability committee and CSR performance. Panel A shows the Heckman's (1979) first-stage probit regression results. Panel B shows Heckman's (1979) second-stage regression results between the presence of a sustainability committee and CSR performance. The numbers in parentheses are t-statistics. All variables are defined in Appendix
***, ** and * represent statistical significance at the 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.