Table 8

Heckman's (1979) two-stage regression results of association between presence of a sustainability committee and CSR performance

Panel A: Heckman (1979) first-stage probit regression results
Dependent variable = SUSTCOM
Coefficientz-statisticsp-value
PROPCOM10.47210.1600.000***
FSIZE0.2449.0800.000***
LEV0.4092.7100.007***
MB−0.208−4.7500.000***
ROA0.1180.5200.605
CGOV0.1121.3900.164
FIN−0.245−1.5300.118
COMPET−0.042−3.7800.000***
GLOBAL0.0090.1200.905
LIQUID0.0592.9700.003***
LITG−0.207−1.6500.099*
FAGE0.2894.9900.000***
Intercept−4.129−15.5200.000***
Year Fixed Effects Yes 
Industry Fixed Effects Yes 
Observations 27,966 
Pseudo R-squared 0.227 
Area under ROC curve 0.849 
Panel B: Heckman (1979) second-stage regression results
Dependent variable = CSR_PERFt+1
Model (1)
SUSTCOM0.037***
(2.898)
IMR0.135***
(5.513)
Constant−0.360***
(−3.883)
Control variablesYes
Year fixed effectsYes
Industry fixed effectsYes
Observations27,966
R-squared0.299
F-statistic60.189***

Note(s): This table shows Heckman's (1979) two-stage regression results of the association between the presence of a sustainability committee and CSR performance. Panel A shows the Heckman's (1979) first-stage probit regression results. Panel B shows Heckman's (1979) second-stage regression results between the presence of a sustainability committee and CSR performance. The numbers in parentheses are t-statistics. All variables are defined in  Appendix

***, ** and * represent statistical significance at the 1%, 5% and 10% levels, respectively

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal