Table 1

Comparison of qualitative vs quantitative probability ratings, impact ratings, and risk scores (N = 1,144)

Location and difference statistics
ParameterRisk probabilityRisk impactRisk score
Mean difference (Qual – Quant)−0.011.114.62
Median difference015
Hodges-lehmann estimate015
95% Bootstrap CIa[0, 0][1, 1][5, 5]
Paired test
TestRisk probabilityRisk impactRisk score
Wilcoxon signed-rank (Pratt)W = 267,649 (p = 0.538)W = 79,274 (p < 0.001)W = 118,278 (p < 0.001)
Distributional test
TestRisk probabilityRisk impactRisk score
Kolmogorov-SmirnovD = 0.05 (p = 0.188)D = 0.44 (p < 0.001)D = 0.38 (p < 0.001)
KS permutation p-valuebp = 0.075p < 0.001p < 0.001
Distance-based tests
MetricRisk probabilityRisk impactRisk score
Wasserstein-1 (W1)0.081.114.62
95% bootstrap CI (paired)a[0.05, 0.13][1.02, 1.19][4.18, 5.04]
Normalised W10.02c0.28c0.19d
95% CI[0.01, 0.03][0.26, 0.30][0.17, 0.21]
Note(s)
a

Bootstrap confidence intervals based on 5,000 paired resamples

b

Permutation p-values computed using 5,000 paired-label permutations

c

Normalised Wasserstein distances computed using the observed 1–5 scale range

d

Normalised Wasserstein distances computed using the observed 1–25 scale range

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal