Verification of discontinuity in winning probability at the 0.95 threshold
| Bidding formula | Estimated discontinuity (robust) | Effective number of observations | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coef. | Std. err. | P > z | Left | Right | ||
| Market type | ||||||
| Competitive (low ) market | General competitive bidding | −0.0006 | 0.136 | 0.996 | 188 | 714 |
| Designated bidding | −0.729 | 0.258 | 0.005 | 318 | 942 | |
| Monopoly market | General competitive bidding | 0.178 | 0.848 | 0.833 | 13 | 14 |
| Designated bidding | −0.887 | 0.088 | 0.000 | 77 | 73 | |
| High market | General competitive bidding | −0.322 | 0.395 | 0.416 | 77 | 177 |
| Designated bidding | −0.865 | 0.131 | 0.000 | 194 | 293 | |
| Before and after the Incident | ||||||
| FY 2014–15 | General competitive bidding | −0.017 | 0.096 | −0.179 | 91 | 219 |
| Designated bidding | −0.696 | 0.119 | −5.848 | 202 | 403 | |
| FY 2017– | General competitive bidding | −0.111 | 0.086 | −1.286 | 405 | 658 |
| Designated bidding | −0.425 | 0.130 | −3.274 | 811 | 856 | |
| Bidding formula | Estimated discontinuity (robust) | Effective number of observations | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coef. | Std. err. | P > z | Left | Right | ||
| Competitive (low | General competitive bidding | −0.0006 | 0.136 | 0.996 | 188 | 714 |
| Designated bidding | −0.729 | 0.258 | 0.005 | 318 | 942 | |
| Monopoly market | General competitive bidding | 0.178 | 0.848 | 0.833 | 13 | 14 |
| Designated bidding | −0.887 | 0.088 | 0.000 | 77 | 73 | |
| High | General competitive bidding | −0.322 | 0.395 | 0.416 | 77 | 177 |
| Designated bidding | −0.865 | 0.131 | 0.000 | 194 | 293 | |
| General competitive bidding | −0.017 | 0.096 | −0.179 | 91 | 219 | |
| Designated bidding | −0.696 | 0.119 | −5.848 | 202 | 403 | |
| General competitive bidding | −0.111 | 0.086 | −1.286 | 405 | 658 | |
| Designated bidding | −0.425 | 0.130 | −3.274 | 811 | 856 | |
This is a summary of six estimations that control for the market environment or the time period while accounting for differences in bidding formulas. The estimation procedure, excluding sample restrictions, is the same as in Table 3; the table format is the same as in Table 4
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.