Port-level cross-case disclosure summary
| Port | Insetting-like initiative types disclosed | CIC dimension(s) evidenced | Double materiality | Scope 4 (avoided emissions) | Knowledge decoupling cues |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rotterdam | Shore power, hydrogen infrastructure, CCS, electrification, industrial symbiosis | Structural, Relational, Human | Yes, double materiality assessment presented | No explicit Scope 4 methodology; avoided emissions discussed qualitatively | ISO/MRV stated; explicit project boundaries; limitations disclosed |
| Antwerp–Bruges | Alternative fuels, electrification, energy transition projects, modal shift | Structural, Relational | Partly, materiality referenced at strategic level, limited methodological detail | No, avoided emissions not disclosed | Standards-based reporting; platform-level boundaries |
| Hamburg | Shore power, renewable energy hubs, digital infrastructure, rail connectivity | Structural, Relational, Human | Implicit, materiality embedded in strategy, not formalised as double materiality | No, avoided emissions not disclosed | Certified systems; infrastructure-bound scope |
| Valencia | Shore power (OPS), renewable energy, energy efficiency, rail infrastructure | Structural | No, materiality not framed as double materiality | No, avoided emissions not disclosed | EMAS/ISO verification; explicit system limits |
| Barcelona | Electrification, alternative fuels, mobility transition, circular initiatives | Structural, Relational, Human | Implicit, sustainability strategy and stakeholder engagement, not formalised as double materiality | No, avoided emissions not disclosed | Initiative-focused; limited methodological disclosure |
| Marseille Fos | Shore power, LNG, hydrogen, modal shift, circular economy projects | Structural, Relational | No, materiality framed narratively | No, avoided emissions not disclosed | Project-level boundaries; no counterfactual framing |
| Ports of Genoa | Electrification, rail connectivity, energy transition projects | Structural, Relational | Implicit, materiality discussed but not formalised | No, avoided emissions not disclosed | Organisational boundaries; limits disclosed |
| Trieste | Rail-based modal shift, energy efficiency, digitalisation | Structural, Relational | Implicit, materiality discussed descriptively | No, avoided emissions not disclosed | System-level boundaries; strategy and measurement separation |
| Piraeus | Electrification, infrastructure upgrades, energy efficiency, EU-funded projects | Structural, Relational, Human | Yes, formal double materiality assessment | No, avoided emissions not disclosed | ESRS-aligned assumptions; risk boundaries; data gaps stated |
| Gdańsk | Electrification, renewable electricity, low-emission construction | Structural, Human | No, materiality not framed as double materiality | No, avoided emissions not disclosed | Scope 1–2 boundaries; no avoided emissions logic |
| Port | Insetting-like initiative types disclosed | CIC dimension(s) evidenced | Double materiality | Scope 4 (avoided emissions) | Knowledge decoupling cues |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rotterdam | Shore power, hydrogen infrastructure, CCS, electrification, industrial symbiosis | Structural, Relational, Human | Yes, double materiality assessment presented | No explicit Scope 4 methodology; avoided emissions discussed qualitatively | ISO/MRV stated; explicit project boundaries; limitations disclosed |
| Antwerp–Bruges | Alternative fuels, electrification, energy transition projects, modal shift | Structural, Relational | Partly, materiality referenced at strategic level, limited methodological detail | No, avoided emissions not disclosed | Standards-based reporting; platform-level boundaries |
| Hamburg | Shore power, renewable energy hubs, digital infrastructure, rail connectivity | Structural, Relational, Human | Implicit, materiality embedded in strategy, not formalised as double materiality | No, avoided emissions not disclosed | Certified systems; infrastructure-bound scope |
| Valencia | Shore power (OPS), renewable energy, energy efficiency, rail infrastructure | Structural | No, materiality not framed as double materiality | No, avoided emissions not disclosed | EMAS/ISO verification; explicit system limits |
| Barcelona | Electrification, alternative fuels, mobility transition, circular initiatives | Structural, Relational, Human | Implicit, sustainability strategy and stakeholder engagement, not formalised as double materiality | No, avoided emissions not disclosed | Initiative-focused; limited methodological disclosure |
| Marseille Fos | Shore power, LNG, hydrogen, modal shift, circular economy projects | Structural, Relational | No, materiality framed narratively | No, avoided emissions not disclosed | Project-level boundaries; no counterfactual framing |
| Ports of Genoa | Electrification, rail connectivity, energy transition projects | Structural, Relational | Implicit, materiality discussed but not formalised | No, avoided emissions not disclosed | Organisational boundaries; limits disclosed |
| Trieste | Rail-based modal shift, energy efficiency, digitalisation | Structural, Relational | Implicit, materiality discussed descriptively | No, avoided emissions not disclosed | System-level boundaries; strategy and measurement separation |
| Piraeus | Electrification, infrastructure upgrades, energy efficiency, EU-funded projects | Structural, Relational, Human | Yes, formal double materiality assessment | No, avoided emissions not disclosed | ESRS-aligned assumptions; risk boundaries; data gaps stated |
| Gdańsk | Electrification, renewable electricity, low-emission construction | Structural, Human | No, materiality not framed as double materiality | No, avoided emissions not disclosed | Scope 1–2 boundaries; no avoided emissions logic |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.