Cronbach’s alpha reliability analysis: Importance of managerial roles in physician leaders’ work
| Subrole | Alpha |
|---|---|
| Figurehead | 0.7654 |
| Leader | 0.769 |
| Liaison | 0.7609 |
| Monitor | 0.7498 |
| Disseminator | 0.7414 |
| Spokesman | 0.7499 |
| Entrepreneur | 0.7561 |
| Disturbance handler | 0.7382 |
| Resource allocator | 0.7629 |
| Negotiator | 0.7402 |
| Cronbach’s alpha reliability analysis | 0.7728 |
| Subrole | Alpha |
|---|---|
| Figurehead | 0.7654 |
| Leader | 0.769 |
| Liaison | 0.7609 |
| Monitor | 0.7498 |
| Disseminator | 0.7414 |
| Spokesman | 0.7499 |
| Entrepreneur | 0.7561 |
| Disturbance handler | 0.7382 |
| Resource allocator | 0.7629 |
| Negotiator | 0.7402 |
| Cronbach’s alpha reliability analysis | 0.7728 |
Note(s): Cronbach’s alpha was calculated for exploratory purposes to evaluate internal consistency across the items representing Mintzberg’s managerial roles (α = 0.77). However, as the roles are conceptually distinct and intended to measure separate constructs, the alpha value should be interpreted cautiously and not as an indicator of the reliability of a single underlying construct
Source(s): Authors’ own work
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.