Illustrative quotes mapped to thematic constructs: governance, cultural norms and resources
| Subconstruct/Theme | Theoretical lens | Summary insight | Illustrative quote | Surgeon code |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Governance | ||||
| Fragmented escalation pathways | ST | Lack of clear or effective escalation channels undermines accountability and enables misconduct to persist | “Escalation pathways exist on paper, but they're not trusted or followed. People go around them, or nothing happens.” | B71 |
| Role ambiguity in leadership | ST | Unclear leadership responsibilities diminish behavioural oversight and reduce trust in governance systems | “We don't always know who's responsible for dealing with poor behaviour. It just floats around.” | A63 |
| Lack of behavioural enforcement | ST | Failure to apply consistent behavioural standards creates conditions for bullying to go unchecked | “Certain individuals never face consequences. Everyone knows, but nothing happens.” | A68 |
| Symbolic consequences and removal of offenders | RDT | Demonstrated consequences for misconduct shift cultural norms and signal institutional seriousness | “When that toxic person finally left, the whole atmosphere lifted. It changed overnight.” | B74 |
| Informal influence in local environments | ST | Localised power structures evolve in governance vacuums, undermining formal accountability mechanisms | “In some places, it's just who's been there longest that calls the shots, not necessarily the best leader.” | B66 |
| Inconsistent clinical governance integration | ST | Separation between clinical and administrative governance leads to blind spots in behavioural accountability | “Clinical governance doesn't always talk to HR or execs. It all feels very disjointed when there's a problem.” | C61 |
| Governance gaps in regional and rural contexts | ST | Absence of senior medical oversight in rural areas allows problematic behaviours to go unchecked | “Out in the regions, there's no senior clinical oversight. People just do what they want.” | B77 |
| Disengaged senior leadership | ST + RDT | Absence of active leadership reduces trust in processes and enables behavioural drift | “You never see the leadership until there's a disaster. That doesn't build much confidence in the system.” | C74 |
| Tokenistic reporting systems | ST | Feedback systems are perceived as ineffective or performative, reducing engagement and voice | “You report something, and it goes into a black hole. People give up trying.” | A68 |
| Executive indifference to surgical issues | ST | Executives are often seen as distant from surgical realities, weakening governance credibility | “The execs don't understand surgery “they're disengaged from what actually happens.” | B79 |
| Unclear accountability chains | ST | Ambiguous role boundaries and unclear escalation pathways allow issues to fall through the cracks | “No one really owns the problem. Everyone assumes it's someone else's job to intervene.” | C71 |
| Tolerance of repeated behavioural breaches | RDT | Perceived institutional tolerance of repeated misconduct erodes trust and emboldens poor behaviour | “There are people with years of complaints, but nothing changes. It's demoralising.” | B74 |
| Behavioural issues minimised by governance structures | ST + RDT | Governance systems may downplay or rationalise misconduct due to fear of reputational risk or political cost | “They're more worried about bad PR than about fixing the culture.” | A75 |
| Informal workarounds substituting for governance | ST | Where formal systems fail, staff rely on informal solutions, which can entrench power imbalances | “We've developed workarounds, but they depend on personalities. That's not a system.” | B66 |
| Cultural norms | ||||
| Gatekeeping based on identity | ST + RDT | Those outside dominant identity groups often face exclusion from influence and opportunity | “It's harder if you're not white, male and trained here. Everything's harder.” | A65 |
| Normalisation of intimidation | ST | Aggression is accepted as part of surgical identity, making it difficult to challenge | “Some surgeons just yell. It's seen as part of the job – no one questions it anymore.” | B74 |
| Gendered expectations of leadership | RDT | Women leaders are scrutinised more harshly and must perform additional emotional labour | “If a woman calls something out, she's ‘difficult.’ If a man does it, he's ‘assertive.’” | C71 |
| Historical professional archetypes | ST | Legacy images of the ‘ideal surgeon’ still shape norms about who belongs and how they should behave | “We're still unpacking decades of macho surgeon culture. It doesn't change overnight.” | A56 |
| Marginalisation of IMGs | RDT | International graduates are often seen as ‘less than’ and excluded from key opportunities | “As an IMG, you're always trying to prove yourself twice as hard.” | C68 |
| Tolerance of passive-aggressive behaviours | ST | Indirect hostility is rarely addressed and contributes to a toxic undertone | “No one swears or yells, but the sarcasm and coldness cut just as deep.” | B66 |
| Professional prestige used to silence | RDT | Influential surgeons are often protected or excused, reinforcing double standards | “If they bring in money or prestige, their behaviour is overlooked.” | A63 |
| Cultural backlash to reform | ST | Attempts to modernise culture can trigger resistance from those invested in the status quo | “You get pushback – ‘We've always done it this way.’ That's the hardest wall to shift.” | B71 |
| Exclusion from informal networks | RDT | Much influence occurs outside formal structures, to which not all staff have access | “If you're not in the after-hours drinks crowd, you're not in the loop.” | C74 |
| Stigma around vulnerability | ST | Expressing uncertainty or stress is viewed as weakness, discouraging help-seeking | “You're expected to be bulletproof. Admitting strain is still taboo.” | A59 |
| Ritualised hierarchy and deference | ST | Respect is often tied to seniority, even when behaviour is poor | “The culture still tells you not to challenge someone more senior – no matter what they say or do.” | B68 |
| Lack of visible consequences for misconduct | ST + RDT | Failure to address behavioural breaches reinforces norm of impunity | “People know who the bullies are. Nothing happens. That's the real problem.” | C71 |
| Microaggressions as cultural baseline | ST | Casual dismissiveness or stereotype-based remarks are pervasive and go unaddressed | “It's not overt discrimination. It's death by a thousand cuts.” | A65 |
| Emotional stoicism as a cultural norm | ST | Emotional detachment is valorised, discouraging relational leadership or empathy | “Showing too much care is seen as soft. That attitude still lingers.” | B79 |
| Resources | ||||
| Uneven access to operating theatres | RDT | Control over theatre time creates power asymmetries that can be used to reward or punish | “If someone doesn't like you, you might find your list bumped again and again.” | A52 |
| Administrative understaffing | ST | Lack of admin support leads to operational chaos, stress and interpersonal tension | “There's just not enough admin staff, so everything is rushed and mistakes happen.” | B81 |
| Late and unpredictable list changes | ST | Unstable scheduling undermines efficiency and increases stress for all team members | “You can't run a safe theatre list if it changes last minute every week.” | C71 |
| Public vs private system disparities | RDT | Private systems offer greater control and stability, reducing sources of conflict | “In private, I know my team and my theatre. In public, it's a lottery.” | B68 |
| Lack of continuity in theatre teams | ST | Frequent rotation of team members inhibits trust and smooth collaboration | “You never know who you're going to get. It makes the whole process harder.” | A67 |
| Access to support staff and equipment | RDT | Gatekeeping of resources is used to assert dominance and control others' effectiveness | “Some people get the best anaesthetist and tools. Others get leftovers.” | B66 |
| Inequitable allocation of procedural opportunities | RDT | Control over high-value learning or work is a key mechanism of influence and exclusion | “Training cases are given out as favoursism, not based on merit or fairness.” | C74 |
| Time pressure and overbooking | ST | Overloaded schedules create a high-stress climate that reduces tolerance and increases conflict | “There's no slack in the systemic if anything goes wrong, tempers flare.” | B79 |
| Under-resourcing of regional hospitals | ST + RDT | Structural underinvestment leads to both resource scarcity and informal power concentration | “There are so few resources that it becomes all about who controls what little there is.” | A75 |
| Inconsistent availability of allied health | ST | Lack of coordination across disciplines disrupts patient flow and increases intra-team frustration | “Physio or OT might not be available, so discharges get delayed, everyone gets frustrated.” | A59 |
| Hidden costs of advocating for staff | RDT | Those who use their capital to support vulnerable staff may face retaliation or marginalisation | “I've spoken up for nurses before, but it's cost me politically.” | A63 |
| Staff turnover driven by burnout | ST | High churn disrupts continuity, erodes team cohesion and amplifies system stress | “Every week someone new is leaving. No wonder the team feels fractured.” | C71 |
| Scarcity as a justification for incivility | ST + RDT | Perceived lack of time or capacity is often used to excuse poor interpersonal behaviour | “People use stress as an excuse. But it's still unacceptable.” | B74 |
| Lack of protected time for teaching and mentoring | ST | Mentoring is seen as optional, not valued or resourced, which limits knowledge sharing and weakens team resilience | “We're supposed to teach, but there's no time, no space, it just doesn't happen.” | B71 |
| Subconstruct/Theme | Theoretical lens | Summary insight | Illustrative quote | Surgeon code |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fragmented escalation pathways | ST | Lack of clear or effective escalation channels undermines accountability and enables misconduct to persist | “Escalation pathways exist on paper, but they're not trusted or followed. People go around them, or nothing happens.” | B71 |
| Role ambiguity in leadership | ST | Unclear leadership responsibilities diminish behavioural oversight and reduce trust in governance systems | “We don't always know who's responsible for dealing with poor behaviour. It just floats around.” | A63 |
| Lack of behavioural enforcement | ST | Failure to apply consistent behavioural standards creates conditions for bullying to go unchecked | “Certain individuals never face consequences. Everyone knows, but nothing happens.” | A68 |
| Symbolic consequences and removal of offenders | RDT | Demonstrated consequences for misconduct shift cultural norms and signal institutional seriousness | “When that toxic person finally left, the whole atmosphere lifted. It changed overnight.” | B74 |
| Informal influence in local environments | ST | Localised power structures evolve in governance vacuums, undermining formal accountability mechanisms | “In some places, it's just who's been there longest that calls the shots, not necessarily the best leader.” | B66 |
| Inconsistent clinical governance integration | ST | Separation between clinical and administrative governance leads to blind spots in behavioural accountability | “Clinical governance doesn't always talk to HR or execs. It all feels very disjointed when there's a problem.” | C61 |
| Governance gaps in regional and rural contexts | ST | Absence of senior medical oversight in rural areas allows problematic behaviours to go unchecked | “Out in the regions, there's no senior clinical oversight. People just do what they want.” | B77 |
| Disengaged senior leadership | ST + RDT | Absence of active leadership reduces trust in processes and enables behavioural drift | “You never see the leadership until there's a disaster. That doesn't build much confidence in the system.” | C74 |
| Tokenistic reporting systems | ST | Feedback systems are perceived as ineffective or performative, reducing engagement and voice | “You report something, and it goes into a black hole. People give up trying.” | A68 |
| Executive indifference to surgical issues | ST | Executives are often seen as distant from surgical realities, weakening governance credibility | “The execs don't understand surgery “they're disengaged from what actually happens.” | B79 |
| Unclear accountability chains | ST | Ambiguous role boundaries and unclear escalation pathways allow issues to fall through the cracks | “No one really owns the problem. Everyone assumes it's someone else's job to intervene.” | C71 |
| Tolerance of repeated behavioural breaches | RDT | Perceived institutional tolerance of repeated misconduct erodes trust and emboldens poor behaviour | “There are people with years of complaints, but nothing changes. It's demoralising.” | B74 |
| Behavioural issues minimised by governance structures | ST + RDT | Governance systems may downplay or rationalise misconduct due to fear of reputational risk or political cost | “They're more worried about bad PR than about fixing the culture.” | A75 |
| Informal workarounds substituting for governance | ST | Where formal systems fail, staff rely on informal solutions, which can entrench power imbalances | “We've developed workarounds, but they depend on personalities. That's not a system.” | B66 |
| Gatekeeping based on identity | ST + RDT | Those outside dominant identity groups often face exclusion from influence and opportunity | “It's harder if you're not white, male and trained here. Everything's harder.” | A65 |
| Normalisation of intimidation | ST | Aggression is accepted as part of surgical identity, making it difficult to challenge | “Some surgeons just yell. It's seen as part of the job – no one questions it anymore.” | B74 |
| Gendered expectations of leadership | RDT | Women leaders are scrutinised more harshly and must perform additional emotional labour | “If a woman calls something out, she's ‘difficult.’ If a man does it, he's ‘assertive.’” | C71 |
| Historical professional archetypes | ST | Legacy images of the ‘ideal surgeon’ still shape norms about who belongs and how they should behave | “We're still unpacking decades of macho surgeon culture. It doesn't change overnight.” | A56 |
| Marginalisation of IMGs | RDT | International graduates are often seen as ‘less than’ and excluded from key opportunities | “As an IMG, you're always trying to prove yourself twice as hard.” | C68 |
| Tolerance of passive-aggressive behaviours | ST | Indirect hostility is rarely addressed and contributes to a toxic undertone | “No one swears or yells, but the sarcasm and coldness cut just as deep.” | B66 |
| Professional prestige used to silence | RDT | Influential surgeons are often protected or excused, reinforcing double standards | “If they bring in money or prestige, their behaviour is overlooked.” | A63 |
| Cultural backlash to reform | ST | Attempts to modernise culture can trigger resistance from those invested in the status quo | “You get pushback – ‘We've always done it this way.’ That's the hardest wall to shift.” | B71 |
| Exclusion from informal networks | RDT | Much influence occurs outside formal structures, to which not all staff have access | “If you're not in the after-hours drinks crowd, you're not in the loop.” | C74 |
| Stigma around vulnerability | ST | Expressing uncertainty or stress is viewed as weakness, discouraging help-seeking | “You're expected to be bulletproof. Admitting strain is still taboo.” | A59 |
| Ritualised hierarchy and deference | ST | Respect is often tied to seniority, even when behaviour is poor | “The culture still tells you not to challenge someone more senior – no matter what they say or do.” | B68 |
| Lack of visible consequences for misconduct | ST + RDT | Failure to address behavioural breaches reinforces norm of impunity | “People know who the bullies are. Nothing happens. That's the real problem.” | C71 |
| Microaggressions as cultural baseline | ST | Casual dismissiveness or stereotype-based remarks are pervasive and go unaddressed | “It's not overt discrimination. It's death by a thousand cuts.” | A65 |
| Emotional stoicism as a cultural norm | ST | Emotional detachment is valorised, discouraging relational leadership or empathy | “Showing too much care is seen as soft. That attitude still lingers.” | B79 |
| Uneven access to operating theatres | RDT | Control over theatre time creates power asymmetries that can be used to reward or punish | “If someone doesn't like you, you might find your list bumped again and again.” | A52 |
| Administrative understaffing | ST | Lack of admin support leads to operational chaos, stress and interpersonal tension | “There's just not enough admin staff, so everything is rushed and mistakes happen.” | B81 |
| Late and unpredictable list changes | ST | Unstable scheduling undermines efficiency and increases stress for all team members | “You can't run a safe theatre list if it changes last minute every week.” | C71 |
| Public vs private system disparities | RDT | Private systems offer greater control and stability, reducing sources of conflict | “In private, I know my team and my theatre. In public, it's a lottery.” | B68 |
| Lack of continuity in theatre teams | ST | Frequent rotation of team members inhibits trust and smooth collaboration | “You never know who you're going to get. It makes the whole process harder.” | A67 |
| Access to support staff and equipment | RDT | Gatekeeping of resources is used to assert dominance and control others' effectiveness | “Some people get the best anaesthetist and tools. Others get leftovers.” | B66 |
| Inequitable allocation of procedural opportunities | RDT | Control over high-value learning or work is a key mechanism of influence and exclusion | “Training cases are given out as favoursism, not based on merit or fairness.” | C74 |
| Time pressure and overbooking | ST | Overloaded schedules create a high-stress climate that reduces tolerance and increases conflict | “There's no slack in the systemic if anything goes wrong, tempers flare.” | B79 |
| Under-resourcing of regional hospitals | ST + RDT | Structural underinvestment leads to both resource scarcity and informal power concentration | “There are so few resources that it becomes all about who controls what little there is.” | A75 |
| Inconsistent availability of allied health | ST | Lack of coordination across disciplines disrupts patient flow and increases intra-team frustration | “Physio or OT might not be available, so discharges get delayed, everyone gets frustrated.” | A59 |
| Hidden costs of advocating for staff | RDT | Those who use their capital to support vulnerable staff may face retaliation or marginalisation | “I've spoken up for nurses before, but it's cost me politically.” | A63 |
| Staff turnover driven by burnout | ST | High churn disrupts continuity, erodes team cohesion and amplifies system stress | “Every week someone new is leaving. No wonder the team feels fractured.” | C71 |
| Scarcity as a justification for incivility | ST + RDT | Perceived lack of time or capacity is often used to excuse poor interpersonal behaviour | “People use stress as an excuse. But it's still unacceptable.” | B74 |
| Lack of protected time for teaching and mentoring | ST | Mentoring is seen as optional, not valued or resourced, which limits knowledge sharing and weakens team resilience | “We're supposed to teach, but there's no time, no space, it just doesn't happen.” | B71 |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.