ANOVA results
| Dependent variable | F-value | p-value | df between | df within | Effect size (η2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cognitive Engagement | 18.42 | <0.001 | 2 | 120 | 0.53 |
| No. of Generated Ideas | 22.67 | <0.001 | 2 | 120 | 0.58 |
| Originality | 15.89 | <0.001 | 2 | 120 | 0.49 |
| Feasibility | 13.75 | <0.001 | 2 | 120 | 0.46 |
| Overconfidence | 19.21 | <0.001 | 2 | 120 | 0.55 |
| Dependent variable | F-value | df between | df within | Effect size (η2) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cognitive Engagement | 18.42 | <0.001 | 2 | 120 | 0.53 |
| No. of Generated Ideas | 22.67 | <0.001 | 2 | 120 | 0.58 |
| Originality | 15.89 | <0.001 | 2 | 120 | 0.49 |
| Feasibility | 13.75 | <0.001 | 2 | 120 | 0.46 |
| Overconfidence | 19.21 | <0.001 | 2 | 120 | 0.55 |
Note(s): The No-AI condition was administered on paper, whereas AI-assisted conditions were online. Cross-mode comparisons are interpreted cautiously. Originality and feasibility scores represent the sum of expert ratings across all ideas per participant (1–3 scale per idea). Per-idea mean analyses produced consistent results
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.