Table 1.

Comparative summary of prior reviews on reverse mentoring and study positioning

ReferenceJournalReview type and methodTime-framePrimary domain(s)Mgmt. focusMain findings / contributionsIdentified gapsADO coverage
Chaudhuri, Park and Johnson (2022b)European Journal of Training and DevelopmentNarrative literature review (Gregory and Denniss 4-step)1998–2020Education, HRD, businessModerateMaps outlets, methods, contexts; shows dominance of education-sector workFew corporate cases; scant evidence on decision design and outcomes; lacks ADO framingAntecedents (partial)
Clarke, Burgess, van Diggele and Mellis (2019) Advances in Medical Education and PracticeNarrative conceptual review– (to 2019)Medical educationLowIntroduces RM to medical education; roles, benefits, success factorsLittle empirical research; no mgmt lens; no decision/outcome dataAntecedents (conceptual)
Garg and Singh (2020) Development and Learning in OrganizationsConceptual / narrative review + cases– (to 2020)HRD, multigenerational workforceModerateSynthesizes drivers, benefits and threats; multigenerational focusNot systematic; minimal empirics; no decision designAntecedents; outcomes (conceptual)
Murphy (2012)(Marcinkus Murphy, 2012)Human Resource ManagementIntegrative conceptual review– (to 2012)HRM, leadership dev.HighFirst comprehensive RM model; frames cross-generational learning and millennial leadershipPurely theoretical; lacks decision data and empirical outcomesAntecedents; outcomes (conceptual)
Singh, Thomas and Numbudiri (2021) Knowledge and Process ManagementIntegrated literature review (PRISMA)2009–2020Knowledge management, KM during pandemicModerateShows limited adoption of RM in practice; proposes triadic IGL model for COVID-19 contextImplementation evidence scarce; no decision-design or outcome data; limited corporate focusAntecedents (conceptual); outcomes (conceptual)
This studyJournal of Management HistorySystematic literature review (ADO-TCM)−2025Management / organizationsHighFirst SLR focused solely on organisational RM; maps antecedents, decision designs and outcomesFills mgmt-sector gap; integrates decision and outcome evidenceAntecedents, decisions, outcomes
Source(s): Authors’ own work

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal