Table 4

Empirical context of Creativo's consortium partnership

PartnerCountryTypeSizeRole in projectProject budget (%)EUGrant (€/%)EU project experience (refined)Relational position
P1 (Coordinator)FinlandCultural centreVery large (national flagship cultural hub, multi-tenant complex)Project coordinator; research anchor15.3212.74High (EU cultural cooperation + transnational cultural management projects)Core-Central Leader
P2BelgiumInternational Arts networkVery large (global performing arts network)Sector advocacy + dissemination4.913.74Very high (EU-funded cultural cooperation programmes)Broker/Network Powerhouse
P3SwedenEuropean cultural networkVery large (EU-wide network, 100+ members)Network dissemination + governance11.7414.02Very high (long-standing EU cultural networks participation)Core-Central Broker
P4United KingdomPublic UniversityVery large (major research university)Academic research lead; evaluation4.293.99Very high (EU research + cultural policy projects)Knowledge Core Actor
P5SwedenMunicipal cultural policy unitLarge (public authority)Policy integration + governance1.320.00High (EU cultural policy frameworks + city networks)Institutional Semi-Central Actor
P6GreecePerforming arts organisationSmall–mediumArtistic experimentation + pilot testing4.617.19Medium (EU cultural mobility + cooperation projects)Semi-Peripheral Specialist
P7ItalyIndependent cultural centreMedium–large (4,000 sqm autonomous cultural hub)Pilot experimentation site4.645.65Medium (participation in EU cultural cooperation via Creative Europe)Semi-Peripheral Specialist
P8SlovakiaCultural development agencyMedium (regional innovation agency)Innovation tools + benchmarking7.218.07Medium–High (EU regional innovation and culture projects)Boundary-Spanning Semi-Central Actor
P9SlovakiaIndependent cultural centreMediumGrassroots experimentation site2.643.41Medium–High (EU cultural cooperation networks via TEH)Semi-Peripheral Specialist
P10United KingdomCultural consultancySmall (specialised consultancy)Capacity building + facilitation7.5114.95High (frequent EU cultural advisory and training roles)Broker/Influential Intermediary
P11ItalyPublic UniversityMedium (regional university)Field research + case studies21.1119.90High (EU research and regional development programmes)Administrative-Knowledge Core Actor
P12NetherlandsCultural venueMedium (established music/cultural venue)Audience development pilot site7.203.33Medium (EU cultural collaboration networks)Peripheral Operational Actor
P13United KingdomCultural venue + creative hubMedium–large (urban creative infrastructure)Urban creative economy pilot7.503.03Medium–High (EU cultural + urban regeneration projects)Peripheral/Symbolic Visibility Actor

Note(s): Given the high heterogeneity of the partners', that radically differ in structure and outputs, we treat ‘Size’ as a multidimensional qualitative construct (Kimberly, 1976) combining four indicators: (1) staff and managerial capacity, (2) annual budget/resource base, (3) physical infrastructure or assets (venues, buildings, sqm, seats), and (4) geographic/network reach and stakeholder centrality. Categories were interpreted as follows: Small = niche/local actors with limited staff/resources; Medium = stable professional organisations with regional/national operations; Large = major public institutions or nationally relevant actors; Very large = transnational networks, universities, or flagship multi-site infrastructures with substantial resources and broad influence (Kimberly, 1976)

Source(s): Authors' own elaboration

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal