Summary table of theoretical and practical results
| Proposition | Core idea | Theoretical implication | Practical focus |
|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | Symbolic and relational power drive university behaviour | Extends Stakeholder Theory toward non-formal influence | Monitor and protect legitimacy assets |
| P2 | Adaptive and defencive behavior under coalition pressure | Links entrepreneurship and systems thinking | Detect early behavioural drift |
| P3 | Compliance preserves legitimacy but limits flexibility | Adds defencive dimension to institutional theory | Balance credibility and collaboration |
| P4 | Staged, resilient strategies foster long-term legitimacy | Integrates resilience and dynamic capabilities | Build learning and support structures |
| Proposition | Core idea | Theoretical implication | Practical focus |
|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | Symbolic and relational power drive university behaviour | Extends Stakeholder Theory toward non-formal influence | Monitor and protect legitimacy assets |
| P2 | Adaptive and defencive behavior under coalition pressure | Links entrepreneurship and systems thinking | Detect early behavioural drift |
| P3 | Compliance preserves legitimacy but limits flexibility | Adds defencive dimension to institutional theory | Balance credibility and collaboration |
| P4 | Staged, resilient strategies foster long-term legitimacy | Integrates resilience and dynamic capabilities | Build learning and support structures |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.