Potential channels through which CSR_COM enhances CSR performance
| (1) | (2) | |
|---|---|---|
| Variables | DISC | CSR_CONT |
| CSR_COM | 0.142*** | −0.905* |
| (13.018) | (−1.744) | |
| Constant | −0.046 | 79.731*** |
| (−0.245) | (6.949) | |
| Year FE | Yes | Yes |
| Firm FE | Yes | Yes |
| Baseline controls | Yes | Yes |
| Observations | 12,278 | 12,278 |
| Adjusted-R2 | 0.699 | 0.260 |
| (1) | (2) | |
|---|---|---|
| Variables | DISC | CSR_CONT |
| CSR_COM | 0.142*** | −0.905* |
| (13.018) | (−1.744) | |
| Constant | −0.046 | 79.731*** |
| (−0.245) | (6.949) | |
| Year FE | Yes | Yes |
| Firm FE | Yes | Yes |
| Baseline controls | Yes | Yes |
| Observations | 12,278 | 12,278 |
| Adjusted- | 0.699 | 0.260 |
Note(s): This table presents results on the direct impact of CSR_COM on DISC and CSR_CONT. Moreover, standard errors are adjusted for heteroscedasticity and serial correlation using clustering at the firm level. t-statistics are reported in the parentheses, whereas the *, ** and *** portray statistical significance at the 10%, 5% and 1% levels, respectively
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.