GMM results
| (1) | (2) | |
|---|---|---|
| Variables | LAWSUIT | LAWSUIT |
| L.LAWSUIT | 0.637*** | 0.532*** |
| [21.40] | [3.94] | |
| RMC | −1.001** | – |
| [−1.99] | – | |
| RMCSIZE | – | −0.072* |
| – | [−1.68] | |
| RMCIND | – | −1.500** |
| – | [−2.19] | |
| RMC_HC | – | 0.418 |
| – | [0.61] | |
| RMC_LEGEXPER | – | −1.295* |
| – | [−1.83] | |
| Other control variables | Yes | Yes |
| Constant | 86.48* | 7.984* |
| [1.72] | [1.84] | |
| Year and Industry | Yes | Yes |
| Observations | 18,478 | 668 |
| AR(1) | z = −13.51, p = 0.000 | z = −1.69, p = 0.090 |
| AR(2) | z = 0.81, p = 0.414 | z = −0.44, p = 0.661 |
| Sargan test | χ2 = −423.99, p = 0.000 | χ2 = −227.87, p = 0.000 |
| Hansen test | χ2 = 235.91, p = 0.866 | χ2 = 99.26, p = 0.982 |
| (1) | (2) | |
|---|---|---|
| Variables | LAWSUIT | LAWSUIT |
| L.LAWSUIT | 0.637*** | 0.532*** |
| [21.40] | [3.94] | |
| RMC | −1.001** | – |
| [−1.99] | – | |
| RMCSIZE | – | −0.072* |
| – | [−1.68] | |
| RMCIND | – | −1.500** |
| – | [−2.19] | |
| RMC_HC | – | 0.418 |
| – | [0.61] | |
| RMC_LEGEXPER | – | −1.295* |
| – | [−1.83] | |
| Other control variables | Yes | Yes |
| Constant | 86.48* | 7.984* |
| [1.72] | [1.84] | |
| Year and Industry | Yes | Yes |
| Observations | 18,478 | 668 |
| AR(1) | ||
| AR(2) | ||
| Sargan test | ||
| Hansen test |
Note(s): This table reports the GMM results on the relationship between RMC, RMC's characteristics and corporate litigation. Robust t-statistics (clustered at the firm level) are reported in parentheses. Continuous variables are winsorized at the 1st and 99th percentiles. *, **, *** denote a two-tailed p-value of less than 0.10, 0.05 and 0.01, respectively. Robust t-statistics (clustered at the firm level) are reported in parentheses. All other variables are defined in appendix
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.