Table 10

Results of the PSM analysis

VariablesTreatedControlsDifferenceS.E.t-stat
Panel A: Covariate matching process
AC0.9960.9950.0000.0030.160
BSIZE9.5459.4050.1400.0951.480
BIND0.3760.376−0.0000.002−0.200
DUAL0.0750.076−0.0000.013−0.040
BTM0.7060.7020.0040.0120.320
ROA0.0270.0270.0000.0030.010
SIZE23.37023.2870.0830.0850.970
LOSS0.1160.124−0.0070.013−0.550
DEBT0.6110.6050.0060.0100.670
FCS0.4620.473−0.0110.021−0.540
BIG40.1250.0990.0250.0132.000
SOE0.7030.706−0.0040.019−0.190
VariablesBias beforeBias afterBias reductiont-test afterP-value after
Panel B: Covariate balance diagnostics before and after matching
AC4.20−3.6013.80−1.000.317
BSIZE47.106.0087.201.000.319
BIND1.201.60−30.600.290.770
DUAL−14.9−0.7095.10−0.170.864
BTM38.504.7087.900.860.389
ROA28.502.2092.100.430.668
SIZE64.507.0089.201.190.232
LOSS7.50−0.9088.10−0.160.871
DEBT77.803.0096.200.580.560
FCS−10.50−7.7026.80−1.470.142
BIG438.3011.1071.001.760.079
SOE83.60−2.4097.20−0.460.645
StatisticUnmatchedMatched
Pseudo (Rˆ2)0.1220.004
LR chi-square776.507.09
p-value0.0000.851
Mean Bias34.704.20
Median Bias33.403.30
Rubin's B103.7013.90
Rubin's R1.541.31
(1)
VariablesPoisson LAWSUIT
Panel B: PSM Regression results
RMC−0.282***
[−3.33]
Other control variablesYes
Constant−11.017*
[−1.92]
Year and IndustryYes
Observations1,396
Pseudo R20.21

Note(s): This table reports PSM results. Panel A shows the results of the matching process. Panel B illustrates the relationship between a standalone RMC and corporate litigation. Continuous variables are winsorized at the 1st and 99th percentiles. ***, and ** denote a two-tailed p-value of less than 0.01 and 0.05, respectively. Robust t-statistics (clustered at the firm level) are reported in parentheses. All variables are defined in appendix

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal